Kirill Rakhman
3b841dcb98
This fixes a bunch of missing overridden symbols in IR. This is also required for fixing KT-59921 in the following commit where we need to keep all overridden symbols of intersection overrides so that we can enhance them properly. #KT-57300 Fixed #KT-57299 Fixed #KT-59921 #KT-57300 #KT-62788 #KT-64271 #KT-64382
61 lines
1.4 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
61 lines
1.4 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
// JVM_ABI_K1_K2_DIFF: KT-63857
|
|
|
|
// FILE: A.java
|
|
abstract public class A extends B {
|
|
public Integer removeAt(int x) { return 0; }
|
|
public boolean remove(Integer x) { return false; }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: main.kt
|
|
import java.util.*;
|
|
|
|
abstract class B : MutableList<Int>, AbstractList<Int>() {
|
|
override fun removeAt(index: Int): Int = null!!
|
|
override fun remove(element: Int): Boolean = null!!
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
abstract class D : AbstractList<Int>() {
|
|
// removeAt() doesn't exist in java/util/AbstractList, it's a
|
|
// fake override of the method from kotlin/collections/MutableList
|
|
override fun removeAt(index: Int): Int = 0
|
|
// AbstractList::remove() should return Int here. No fake overrides created.
|
|
// This may be a bug because the old compiler doesn't report a diagnostic here.
|
|
override fun remove(element: Int): Boolean = false
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun testABD(a: A, b: B, d: D) {
|
|
a.remove(1)
|
|
a.removeAt(0)
|
|
b.remove(1)
|
|
b.removeAt(0)
|
|
d.remove(1)
|
|
d.removeAt(0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun testArrayList(c: ArrayList<Int>) {
|
|
c.remove(1)
|
|
c.removeAt(0)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class AImpl : A() {
|
|
override fun get(index: Int): Int = 0
|
|
override val size: Int get() = 0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class DImpl : D() {
|
|
override fun get(index: Int): Int = 0
|
|
override val size: Int get() = 0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
testABD(AImpl(), AImpl(), DImpl())
|
|
|
|
val c = ArrayList<Int>()
|
|
c.add(1)
|
|
c.add(1)
|
|
testArrayList(c)
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|