Otherwise, it leads to branches inference run fully independent,
while there are cases when it's necessary to flow type information from
one of the branch to another (see the new test).
NB. In K1, it worked differently: if branches were inferred altogether
only for Any/Any? expect types (otherwise they're analyzed independently)
See foo2/foo4 in the test.
To avoid breaking change we need to support foo1/foo3, but we're trying
not to have some special rule for Any, so we've got a new resolution mode
that provides expect type, but doesn't require full completion.
^KT-45989 Fixed
^KT-56563 Fixed
^KT-54709 Related
For change in specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
At first, see at KT-36776
Long time ago, it's been decided that if/when resolution
should look similar to similar "select()" calls,
but it's a breaking change (see KT-36776), and we were ready for that back then.
But then, there were too many broken cases found, thus we reverted it at
100a6f70ca
But probably, it would be better to try to infer `String?`
instead of `Nothing?` (see next commits)
Note that change in specialCallWithMaterializeAndExpectedType.kt
will be addressed in later commits, too
Implicit type might have two meaning there:
- noExpectedType
- unknown declaration type where this expression is assigned to
For both cases, we've got ResolutionMode.ContextIndependent that works
just fine
When expected type is known, use it as expected type for branch bodies.
While it indeed becomes different from the usual select call resolution,
where expected type is applied only after completion starts,
it helps to support, e.g. callable references resolution just as powerful
as it was in K1.
Also, in some cases where diagnostics have been changed, they become
a bit more helpful since they are reported closer
to the problematic places
cannotCastToFunction.kt test has been removed because it relied
on the case erroneously supported by the hack removed from
the FirCallResolver in this commit.
^KT-45989 Fixed
^KT-55936 Fixed
^KT-56445 Fixed
^KT-54709 Related
^KT-55931 Related
Beside some corner cases, it's already prohibited in K1 because
adaptation have a bit strange nature
(they don't represent any existing real function exactly)
^KT-55137 Fixed
Some of the changed tests may duplicate other existing diagnostics,
but that should not be reason not to report them at all.
There might be another job to be done to avoid diagnostic duplications
For example, NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER
It became especially relevant after 0e84bf2053
that together with later commits bring a lot of unnecessary
NEW_INFERENCE_NO_INFORMATION_FOR_PARAMETER diagnostic
If enum class from dependencies is used, which was compiled by a new version of the plugin, which uses a factory and does not create a nested `$serializer` class, then an `SERIALIZER_NOT_FOUND` diagnostic error is thrown for such an enumeration.
This happens if the old serialization runtime is used for the current project - in this case, the serializer is taken from the nested class `$serializer`. Since it is missing, the diagnostics does not work correctly.
It is acceptable for enumerations to ignore this error, because we know that enumerations are always serializable.
Merge-request: KT-MR-8818
Merged-by: Sergey Shanshin <Sergey.Shanshin@jetbrains.com>
Now it is encapsulated to DefaultKotlinSourceSet and is lazily created
upon demand during project import
But metadata configurations still should be created during metadata
target configuration.
^KT-56431 Verification Pending
Address reviewer's comment
Fix test on Windows: remove \r from compared strings
Merge-request: KT-MR-8799
Merged-by: Vladimir Sukharev <Vladimir.Sukharev@jetbrains.com>
- Add IrPluginContext to JvmBackendContext, so plugin intrinsics can
reference external functions properly.
- Do not use module.findClassAcrossModuleDependencies as Descriptor API does not work for FIR.
- Add asm listing tests in serialization plugin for K2
- Remove Delegated.kt asm listing test as we have similar test in boxIr group.
#KT-56553 Fixed
The dependency signature may refer to function type interface properties
(e.g. name) or methods. It is impossible to detect (without hacks)
which binary symbol for loading is required. However, when loading
a property or a method the entire function type interface is loaded.
And vice versa, a loading of function type interface loads
properties and methods as well. Therefore, load the top level signature only,
it must be the signature of function type interface.
^KT-56582 Fixed
In before, each function reference created 5 functions needed only
for equals/hashcode properties. It contributed arround 3.5% of code size
on several sample projects. This is now replaced by passing constant
object to base class constructor.
Logging in maven has been slightly changed, so it no longer matches the old patterns. It was flaky because sometimes it loaded the plexus artifact (and sometimes it didn't) and such event was shown in the log with different log message
Denis.Zharkov