In this commit we upgrade FIR builder inference logic from
the compiler version to 1.7. FIR-based compiler now works with
"don't use builder inference" flag always ON and supports switching
the flag "use builder inference only if needed". To do it,
ContraintSystemCompleter (FIR) and KotlinConstraintSystemCompleter (FE 1.0)
are made similar with extracting some common parts into
ConstraintSystemCompletionContext.
Test status: one BB test fails after this commit (KT-49285).
Also we have a crush in DFA logic in FIR bootstrap test and somehow
questionable behavior in FIR diagnostic test. However,
two BB tests were fixed, the 3rd case from KT-49925 were also fixed.
#KT-49925 Fixed
Result of calling `ExpressionCodegen.gen` was used only in two call
sites in the inliner. In all other call sites, we were doing unnecessary
work (and sometimes were even failing) by trying to construct a
KotlinType instance out from an IrType.
Note that even though the code from KT-50617 no longer fails to compile,
the underlying problem is still not solved, since the IrType for foo's
dispatch receiver is constructed incorrectly. The reason is that
SymbolTable links everything by IdSignature, which is identical for
classes with the same FQ name.
#KT-50617 Fixed
Previously enhanced symbols were cached inside SignatureEnhancement,
which is created independently for each enhancement scope. This may
cause creation of multiple enhanced symbols for same java declaration
in presence of multiple scope sessions (mutithread compiler, IDE,
separate scope session for checkers)
^KT-50858 Fixed
This big refactoring is needed to cleanup building of overrides
mappings and prevent creating redundant intersection overrides in
cases when there is no need in them:
```kotlin
interface A {
fun foo()
}
interface B {
fun foo()
}
interface C : A, B {
override fun foo()
}
```
Before this refactoring there was next override tree:
C.foo
intersection override (A.foo, B.foo)
A.foo
B.foo
Also this commit fixes special mapping of overrides in jvm scopes
for declarations which have kotlin builtins in supertypes with
special java mapping rules (collections, for example)
It's safe as not having const is more restrictive, therefore can be
allowed in common. Otherwise, it's not possible to declare an expect
declaration for a platform property with `const` modifier in common
KT-18856
Otherwise the tests are flaky for some reason; stack overflow is thrown
from psi2ir sometimes. Probably it has something to do with the fact
that the JVM stack which is used by the compiler here is around the
default limit (which is 1M).
Ivan Kochurkin