fix checking for intersection types in CheckIncompatibleTypeVariableUpperBounds
we need this resolve, because getEmptyIntersectionTypeKind under
the hood uses org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.checkers.EmptyIntersectionTypeChecker.computeEmptyIntersectionEmptiness
which uses computeByHavingCommonSubtype where we have
isFinalClassConstructor() call, so we need to resolve to STATUS phase
to get the correct modality
^KT-56543
- In performance tests, modification trackers were incorrectly
incremented between tests for binary modules even with library caches
enabled. The new option `includeBinaryTrackers` can be used by
performance tests to exclude binary modules.
The compiler should only report diagnostics for
comparisons over builtins and identity-less types,
other incompatibilities should be reported
via inspections.
It's ok that in `equalityChecksOnIntegerTypes`
instead of `EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE_WARNING` we get
`EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE`, because
`ProperEqualityChecksInBuilderInferenceCalls`
is already active by default.
This change also replaces the notion of a representative superclass
with the least upper bound.
This makes complex types like
intersection/flexible transparent to
RULES1-based compatibility checks.
One way to look at it is to think
that this is an automatic way of handling
type parameters: automatic picking of
"interesting" bounds, and checking them against one another.
Note that `TypeIntersector.intersectTypes`
for `Int` and `T` where `T` is a type parameter
may return both `{Int & T}` or `null`
depending on `T`-s bounds. At the same time,
for type parameters `T` and `K` it will
always return `{T & K}`.
`ConeTypeIntersector.intersectTypes`, on the
other hand, will always return `{Int & T}`
irrespectively of the bounds. Meaning, the two
intersectors differ in corner cases.
`lowerBoundIfFlexible` call in `isLiterallyTypeParameter` is backed by
the `equalityOfFlexibleTypeParameters` test.
^KT-35134 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-22499 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-46383 #fixed-in-k2
All other compiler plugins accept "pkg1.pkg2.Class1" classes notation
and correctly match against it
But Assignment plugin used `ClassId` on such qualified names and got
`ClassId("/pkg1.pkg2.Class1")` instead of `ClassId("pkg1/pkg2/Class1")`,
and that lead to unexpected problems
This commit fixes that by using `FqName` instead of `ClassId`
^KT-57406 Fixed
Root cause: commonizer does not add `ExternalObjCClass` annotation
to expect declarations, so forward declarations aren't resolved.
It is simpler (and safer) to fix it on the compiler side by checking
superclass instead of annotation.
This option makes the compiler use Kotlin/Native-provided LLVM
instead of Xcode-provided LLVM when compiling bitcode to machine code
for Apple targets.
^KT-54799 Fixed
This parameter accepts the name of the "mode" in which the partial linkage would work. Currently, only two options are supported: 'enable', 'disable'. But the list may be extended in the future as needed.
At the moment the 'disable' option is the default one. This will be changed in #KT-51447, #KT-51443.
Dmitrii Gridin