Nikolay Lunyak
a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
34 lines
676 B
Kotlin
Vendored
34 lines
676 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// FILE: 1.kt
|
|
|
|
package test
|
|
|
|
private class S public constructor() {
|
|
class Z {
|
|
fun a(): String {
|
|
return "K"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
val empty = ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
enum class E(val s: String) {
|
|
EMPTY("")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// This function exposes S.Z and S.E, nested into a private class S (package-private in the byte code)
|
|
// They can be accessed outside the `test` package now that S.Z, S.E are public in the byte code, but that may be changed later
|
|
internal inline fun call(s: () -> String): String {
|
|
return s() + S.Z().empty + S.E.EMPTY.s + S.Z().a()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: 2.kt
|
|
|
|
import test.*
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
return call {
|
|
"O"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|