This previously worked on accident because the get call in an
augmented array assignment wouldn't have a resolved argument list, and
so `argumentsToSubstitutedValueParameters` would return null.
Now, we additionally verify that we're in a `set` call.
#KT-66124
FirNamedArgumentExpressions don't exist anymore during FIR2IR phase
and so handling FirSpreadArgumentExpression in Fir2IrVisitor is
sufficient.
#KT-66124
This lets us get rid of some fallback code in FIR2IR that handles
unresolved argument lists.
After this, we should have an invariant that all non-empty argument
lists are resolved when FIR2IR runs.
#KT-66124
They are mostly necessary for argument mapping during resolution.
To support a couple checkers, we transform named args for varargs
into "fake" spread expressions.
Other than that, named arguments aren't needed for anything and often
lead to bugs where we forget to unwrap them for something, so it's
better to get rid of them.
#KT-66124
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a
trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression.
Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs
(UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were
caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda.
#KT-66124
Instead, it should happen during BODY_RESOLVE phase.
This fixes KT-66150. The problem was, that `super<B>.f()` expression
in delegated constructor call was transformed during TYPES phase,
and type transformer has no special logic for allowing bare types in
super qualifiers, like the one in expressions transformer (see
`org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.transformers.body.resolve.FirExpressionsResolveTransformer.transformSuperReceiver`).
As a result, `B` without type argument leads to
WrongNumberOfTypeArgumentsError.
It looks incorrect that expressions in constructor call resolved
during TYPES phase, so skipping transformation of
argument list seems like the best solution here.
^KT-66150 Fixed
In most affected tests, the backend diagnostic such as "conflicting JVM
signature" or "accidental override" is directly caused by some already
existing error reported by frontend, so it doesn't make sense to check
backend diagnostics there.
Tests where that was not the case were moved/copied to
`testsWithJvmBackend`.
All of these tests were actually copied to `testsWithJvmBackend` in
866f188120, but it's unclear why they were copied instead of moved. The
test runner for `testsWithJvmBackend` correctly runs the compiler
pipeline and obtains errors reported by the backend, as opposed to the
common diagnostic tests which have a very custom code, using parts of
the old JVM backend, to obtain these diagnostics.
- `require.kt` was added to check JVM accidental override diagnostic
when using the "traits with required classes" feature, which was
removed a long time ago.
- `withErrorTypes.kt` was testing conflicting JVM declarations error (a
backend diagnostic) in presence of error types -- not very useful
scenario because the backend is not run when there's a frontend error.
Basically, just calculate them the same
way it's done for other members.
`chooseIntersectionVisibilityForSymbolsOrNull`
is named like this to prevent a JVM clash.
^KT-66046 Fixed
Mikhail Glukhikh