It's expected to partially mimic the behavior of what
previously was called builder inference, but with more clear contracts
(documentation is in progress, though)
See a lot of fixed issues in the later commits with test data,
especially [red-to-green]
^KT-59791 In Progress
StandardClassIds was using Annotations subclass in its initialization.
At the same time, Annotations subclass was using StandardClassIds in its
initialization implicitly through baseId() method.
This leads to a rare deadlock on CI in case where two different threads
tried to initialize both classes at the same time.
It can't be reproduced robustly, as a single thread was able to
successfully initialize both, and will do it on an attempt to
initialize any of them.
^KT-64720 Fixed
We don't have true flexible types in the IR, but we approximate it with
internal type annotations, such as FlexibleNullability,
FlexibleMutability, RawType. These annotations are then handled
specially in JvmIrTypeSystemContext, which can construct a fake flexible
type so that type checker on IR types would behave exactly as on
frontend types.
As shown in KT-63441, one instance of flexible types where flexibility
was lost during conversion to IR is Java array/vararg types. It's
necessary to support it so that IR fake overrides could be constructed
correctly, because IR fake override checker requires parameter types to
be equal. So this change introduces another internal type annotation,
FlexibleArrayElementVariance, which is only applicable to types with
classifier kotlin/Array, and which signifies that the annotated type
`Array<X>` should rather be seen as `Array<X>..Array<out X>`.
#KT-63441 Fixed
#KT-63446 Fixed
The problem from KT-63624 was that during matching phase we must choose
only one candidate, but in Java we can have two successfully matched
properties: 1) from field and 2) from method, which overrides Kotlin
property.
See test `propertyAgainstJavaPrivateFieldAndPublicMethod.kt`.
As a result, we choose field candidate, throw away method candidate, and
then fail during visibility check.
Instead of inventing special rule of prioritizing field over method
it was decided to prohibit actualization to Java field at all because:
1. It doesn't seem that Java fields actualization was implemented in K1
on purpose
2. People usually don't use public Java fields, and use instead
private field + getter, especially when compatibility is important, so
it shouldn't be a breaking change
Besides that, such solution simplifies code and is consistent with
the current logic of matcher, which doesn't expect that two members
can be matched successfully. Also, it fixes KT-63624 and KT-63667.
^KT-63624 Fixed
^KT-63667 Fixed
When we check Java field for constant initializer, we could
be asked to get and check the type of Kotlin's property that
is used in this Java field. But there is no guarantee that the type
resolve phase was finished and this type is available. So we just
check for `const` modifier and skip type check.
#KT-63752 Fixed
#KT-62558 Obsolete
#KT-61786 Declined
Swift Export Frontend generates a Kotlin file/library that contains a
set of simple bridging functions that connect Swift wrappers to their
Kotlin counterparts.
There are certain requirements for these wrappers:
1. They should not be DCEd when compiling a binary library.
In other words, these functions are roots.
2. They should provide a stable simple binary name.
3. Their signatures should be much simpler and restricted comparing to
other Kotlin functions.
Altogether, these requirements should be covered by introducing the new
ExportedBridge annotation.
Note: Frontend checks of ExportedBridge functions are not implemented
yet.
It's going to be deprecated in Gradle 8.3
There's currently no way to pass a `org.gradle.api.provider.Provider` to the JavaExec.systemProperty or Test.systemProperty. There's a workaround using `org.gradle.process.CommandLineArgumentProvider`, but I intentionally don't rework these calls as Gradle is going to allow passing providers to configure system properties: https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/12247#issuecomment-1568427242
^KTI-1473 In Progress
In strict mode, an exception will be thrown when inconsistent metadata is encountered. In lenient mode, the reader will attempt to handle the inconsistent metadata by ignoring certain inconsistencies. This is a solution to a problem of reading metadata 'from the future' that is not allowed by default, but desired in certain cases. See updated ReadMe for details.
Also fix problem with Strict Semantics flag.
#KT-57922 Fixed
#KT-59441 Fixed
Previously, because we didn't handle flexible types properly in
prepareCapturedType, projections inside flexible types would only be
captured during subtyping with captureStatus=FOR_SUBTYPING
which would lead to the constraint type being wrongly approximated
(see ConstraintInjector.TypeCheckerStateForConstraintInjector
.addNewIncorporatedConstraint).
Fixing the capturing produced two kinds of false positive diagnostics:
1. In ConstraintInjector.TypeCheckerStateForConstraintInjector
.addNewIncorporatedConstraint we would get two instances of cone types
that are structurally equal and containing the same captured type.
However, because we only skipped subtyping if the types were
referentially equal, we would get a contradiction here.
The fix was to use structural equality instead, which should be okay
as the captured type instances are the same.
2. Reified type variables were inferred to captured types because
flexible arrays with captured upper bounds
(Array<Foo>..Array<Captured(out Foo)>?) were not properly approximated.
#KT-62609 Fixed
FirDefaultArgumentsInExpectActualizedByFakeOverrideChecker is an adhoc
checker which can be converted to ExpectActualCheckingCompatibility to
reuse common expect-actual checking infrastructure.
^KT-62913 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13094/timeline
Tests that were broken by one of my previous commits are now fixed:
- actualFakeOverride_paramsAreCompatibleViaSharedMethodWithDefaultParams.kt
- inheritedJavaMembers.kt
DEFAULT_ARGUMENTS_IN_EXPECT_ACTUALIZED_BY_FAKE_OVERRIDE diagnostic
disappeared in delegation.fir.kt because only one
AbstractExpectActualChecker incompatibility can be reported at a time
(DEFAULT_ARGUMENTS_IN_EXPECT_ACTUALIZED_BY_FAKE_OVERRIDE is now reported
not by adhoc checker but by common AbstractExpectActualChecker). It
would be nice to report both of them, but it's a separate issue KT-62631
delegation2 test makes sure that
DEFAULT_ARGUMENTS_IN_EXPECT_ACTUALIZED_BY_FAKE_OVERRIDE is reported when
NO_ACTUAL_CLASS_MEMBER_FOR_EXPECTED_CLASS is fixed
On CI when populating build cache, the build runs
with --info logging level causing an additional jvm argument
provided to the task.
This argument is usually not provided in local builds.
The argument only affects task printout and not its outputs.
- It became unused after cc70f78027
- And it's not going to become used in the nearest future, since in K2,
we won't have "member scopes" check on frontend (for now)
- Migrate ExpectActualCompatibility -> ExpectActualCheckingCompatibility
where the "checker" is expect
- Migrate ExpectActualCompatibility -> ExpectActualMatchingCompatibility
where the "matching" is expect
KT-62590 in progress. A lot of tests start to fail now. I will fix them
in next commits
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/12750/timeline
1. Support variance in ErrorListDiagnosticListRenderer.
I will make some diagnostics to have covariant type arguments in the
next commits
2. Drop unused code
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/12750/timeline
It should have been WeakIncompatible from the beginning because it's not
possible to overload by return type in Kotlin
This commit is a step forward to fix KT-62591
Unfortunately, the test cannot demonstrate the problem because of
another bug in K2 KT-59887
^KT-62752 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/12750/timeline
Motivation:
It makes expect-actual matching-checking model more consistent.
expect-actual "matching" is run before FirResolvePhase.BODY_RESOLVE. You
can't know return types, until you run BODY_RESOLVE. That's why the
return type can't be checked during expect-actual matching. But it's
cursed: you have something that have to match by, but, at the same time,
you can't do it.
expect-actual "checking" is run after FirResolvePhase.BODY_RESOLVE.
That's why if we convert ReturnType incompatibility to WeakIncompatible
(which should have been called CheckingIncompatible), then expect-actual
matching model becomes consistent.
We will also be able to get rid of unnecessary
FirActualCallableDeclarationChecker. Because it won't be necessary.
Return types will be checked by common logic of expect-actual "checker"
Annotation loaders for descriptors (AnnotationAndConstantLoaderImpl) and
stubs (AnnotationLoaderForStubBuilderImpl) share the loading logic until
mapping ProtoBuf.Annotations to output values. The shared logic has been
extracted to the base class.
KTIJ-26761
KTIJ-26961
Denis.Zharkov