LLVMConstGEP2 and LLVMConstInBoundsGEP2 were forward declared in
LLVM-11, but not implemented until LLVM-14. This patch adds these along
with the missing LLVMAddAlias2. All three implementations are copied
from llvm branch release/14.x
We don't have "expect as libraries" feature yet. But once we have the
feature, the code in question might start silently behave incorrectly.
Add assertions to make sure that the code will fail
Previously, the validation was that the port is within the [1, 65535) range. Considering the defined range [17001, 18000) for the random port selector, it makes more sense to check that range instead.
A few messages were improved:
* If the daemon process died at the startup, add its last 10 lines of the output to the log and report to the EXCEPTION (ERROR in the case of Gradle) level
* If some exception occurs during connection attempt, add its stacktrace and report to the EXCEPTION (ERROR in the case of Gradle) level
* Added more DEBUG level messages
* Some important messages are moved to the INFO level
* Added a suggestion to report issue to kotl.in/issue
^KT-55322 Fixed
Before this change, some long-running tasks like `run` might cause the Kotlin daemon to go into the LastSession state and stay in that state until the long-running tasks and therefore the Gradle build are finished.
The reason for that behaviour is that if we don't release sessions explicitly, the created "session is alive" marker files are cleaned up by `KotlinGradleFinishBuildHandler.buildFinished` at the end of the build.
^KT-55322 In Progress
Before this change, the logic was to find the most suitable daemon and try connecting to it in a loop, ignoring the fact that it could be dying. Now, instead of trying to connect to the daemon dying daemon in a loop, we will make only 1 attemp and then skip if it's already dying.
^KT-55322 In Progress
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13334/timeline
Thanks to the previous commit, it's now possible to run
DefaultArgumentsInExpectActualizedByFakeOverride on both: frontend (FIR)
and backend (IR).
We aim to perform a thorough examination of checks involving
fake-overrides on both FIR and IR, given their distinct implementations
for handling fake-overrides.
The commit decreases scope of influence of hacky
`shouldCheckDefaultParams` flag.
^KT-63860 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/13334/timeline
The previous code was nonsense (I wrote it). It doesn't make sense to
subtract actualOverriddenDeclarations from expectOverriddenDeclarations.
Default parameters are mentioned on the expect side. So default params
in expect/actual supertypes won't be subtracted from
expectOverriddenDeclarations (but should be)
There were a number of locals where components of InitialConstraint were
named lower and upper in the FirBuilderInferenceSession.
That is not true for equality constraints, so such naming should be
avoided to avoid misconception about the nature of type relation encoded
in constraint.
^KT-64031 Fixed
It's now impossible to add new classes to metadata, because this
functionality is not implemented in IrGeneratedDeclarationsRegistrar
and FirDeclarationsForMetadataProviderExtension is removed
`IrGeneratedDeclarationsRegistrar` assumes that all generated functions
are correct from a Kotlin point of view. But `writeSelf` method on JVM
is a static method outside any object/companion object
So to properly calculate containing class for this method we should
generate a dispatch receiver parameter, register the method in metadata,
and then remove the parameter (to make function static)
The condition was added to the substitute function, when it was also
re-used in delegate inference.
However, delegate inference no longer uses this function.
It is not very possible to both have variable fixed and being present in
nonFixedToVariablesSubstitutor in builder inference.
^KT-64028 Fixed
There are two overloads of substitute function
in the FirBuilderInferenceSession.
In fact, it has very different usage and semantics.
Relates to KT-64028
This commit covers enum entry vs companion member case,
when two companion objects are in the scope.
K1 reports UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE here, probably due to ambiguity.
About K2, while resolving Some.foo it first tries to resolve Some
as a "general" variable access, and gets two candidates with companions.
After that it tries to resolve Some as a qualifier,
but we have no scope with a single qualifier, so no influence here.
With two ambiguous candidates with companions for Some,
OVERLOAD_RESOLUTION_AMBIGUITY is reported.
This commit covers enum entry vs companion member case,
when one companion object is in the scope.
K1 reports UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE here, probably due to ambiguity.
About K2, while resolving Some.foo it first tries to resolve Some
as a "general" variable access, and gets the only candidate with companion.
After that it tries to resolve Some as a qualifier,
but we have no scope with a single qualifier, so no influence here.
Finally during foo resolve it should choose between enum entry and
companion member, and enum entry wins due to KT-37591.
This commit covers object vs static member case,
when no companion objects are in the scope.
K1 reports UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE here, probably due to ambiguity.
About K2, while resolving Some.foo it first tries to resolve Some
as a "general" variable access, and gets two erroneous candidates
without companions. After it tries to resolve Some as a qualifier,
but we have no scope with a single qualifier.
That's why we finally report NONE_APPLICABLE on candidates with companions.
This commit covers object vs companion member vs static member case
but now we have two different companions (first is empty) in the scope.
K1 reports UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE here, probably due to ambiguity.
About K2, while resolving Some.foo it first tries to resolve Some
as a "general" variable access, and gets some/Some & some2/Some
because both of them have a companion. This means ambiguity.
After it tries to resolve Some as a qualifier, but we have no scope
with a single qualifier, so finally we prefer to report ambiguity
from variable access resolve.
This commit covers object vs companion member vs static member case
in situation with only one companion in the scope.
K1 reports UNRESOLVED_REFERENCE here, probably due to ambiguity.
About K2, while resolving Some.foo it first tries to resolve Some
as a "general" variable access, and gets only some2/Some
because it has a companion. Then it tries to resolve Some as a qualifier,
but here we have an ambiguity, so finally Some with companion is preferred.
Again, both frontends here ignored classifiers from
explicit star imported scope (some.HashMap, java.util.HashMap)
because of their ambiguity. In case of K2, it works so due to logic
in BodyResolveComponents.resolveRootPartOfQualifier.
This function is called to resolve qualifier without receiver.
See also cases (3) and (7).
In this test, things work in the similar way as in constructors case (2).
K1 resolves the explicit receiver HashMap<String, String>()
to kotlin.collections.HashMap /* = java.util.HashMap */.
K2 does the similar, but fun processConstructors from ConstructorProcessing.kt
makes a type alias substitution, so in fact constructor of expanded
java.util.HashMap is processed.
Pay attention that both frontends ignore some.HashMap and java.util.HashMap
due to ambiguous classifiers in explicit star importing scope.
See FirScope.processConstructorsByName in ConstructorProcessing.kt
Again, both frontends here ignored classifiers from
explicit star imported scope (some.HashMap, java.util.HashMap)
because of their ambiguity. In case of K2, it works so due to logic
in BodyResolveComponents.resolveRootPartOfQualifier.
This function is called to resolve qualifier without receiver
Again, both frontends here ignored classifiers from
explicit star imported scope (some.HashMap, java.util.HashMap)
because of their ambiguity. In case of K2, it works so due to logic
in BodyResolveComponents.resolveRootPartOfQualifier.
This function is called to resolve qualifier without receiver, in case
it's used as a receiver itself (::class counts as a selector equivalent).
In both these situations, we have some.HashMap & java.util.HashMap
from explicit star importing scope, and kotlin.collections.HashMap
from implicit star importing scope after it.
K1 ignores both explicitly imported classifiers due to their ambiguity,
and then resolves to kotlin.collections.HashMap at the next level.
In contrast, K2 takes explicitly imported classifiers and
properly reports ambiguity.
In this test, both frontends resolve to fun Semaphore.
Both work this way because interface/class Semaphore classifiers are
clashed (ambiguity) and ignored.
K2 reports ambiguity for some similar cases,
but constructor resolve still ignores ambiguous classifiers when found.
(see FirScope.processConstructorsByName in ConstructorProcessing.kt)
In this test, K1 resolves to kotlin.collections.HashMap /* = java.util.HashMap */
K2 does the similar, but fun processConstructors from ConstructorProcessing.kt
makes a type alias substitution, so in fact constructor of expanded
java.util.HashMap is processed.
Pay attention that both frontends ignore some.HashMap and java.util.HashMap
due to ambiguous classifiers in explicit star importing scope.
See FirScope.processConstructorsByName in ConstructorProcessing.kt
Nikita Bobko