Commit Graph

4999 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kirill Rakhman 2095f90e69 [FIR] Fix exception in Java scope caused by inherited member with implicit return type
It's caused by checking the return type of an inherited property.
toConeKotlinTypeProbablyFlexible() returns an error type when the
type ref is unresolved instead of throwing.
This "breaks" some override checks and in the added test, it leads
to an additional candidate being created for a synthetic property.
However, the candidate has applicability K2_SYNTHETIC_RESOLVED
and gets filtered out because the real property has a higher
applicability.

#KT-66392 Fixed
2024-03-15 12:01:55 +00:00
Stanislav Ruban bf77cc3d0c [tests][FIR][checkers][JS] Add test data for KT-66474 2024-03-15 11:40:55 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 8ac576614f Revert "Temporary: mute PRE_RELEASE_CLASS in some tests (KT-66551)"
This reverts commit 893e5cac
2024-03-15 11:33:10 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh cd20f31810 K2: introduce JavaTypeParameterDefaultRepresentationWithDNN exp. feature
#KT-66447 Fixed
2024-03-14 22:39:03 +00:00
Alevtina.Gamzikova 7d06b34bfa [Test] KT-64350 Add testcases 2024-03-14 20:41:53 +00:00
Jaebaek Seo 90ccdb79ed K2: Set special function kind to function param with receiver
`StubBasedFirTypeDeserializer` handles function parameter with a
receiver with a special exception, which sets it as
`ExtensionFunctionType`, but skips setting special function kinds for it
even when the function parameter type is a special function kind. This
drops `Composable` annotation from a lambda expression if the function
parameter taking the lambda expression as an argument has a receiver,
which causes a severe CodeGen error for Compose app on K2 Android
Studio.

^KT-66526 Fixed
2024-03-14 20:08:24 +00:00
Sergej Jaskiewicz 9851ff1905 [FIR] Reproduce KT-66277, KT-66279, KT-66512 and KT-66534 2024-03-14 18:34:30 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin b3827947d9 [Analysis API] Update KDoc for KtPsiTypeProvider#asKtType 2024-03-14 18:05:15 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 5689dedea0 [Analysis API FIR] KtFirPsiTypeProvider: drop redundant TODO
Regular type annotations work as expected

^KT-62351 Obsolete
2024-03-14 18:05:15 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin ba421aa320 [Analysis API FIR] KtFirPsiTypeProvider: support type parameter position in asKtType
^KT-66530
2024-03-14 18:05:15 +00:00
Dmitrii Gridin 675bf36049 [FIR] JavaTypeParameterStack: allow nullable return from get
It is not always possible to have the correct mapping,
at least on the Analysis API side

^KT-66530 Fixed
2024-03-14 18:05:15 +00:00
Artem Kobzar eb8054ac1e [K/Wasm] Fix object optimization false trigger on non-pure objects ^KT-66471 Fixed 2024-03-14 17:12:45 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 7d6cd8d126 Tests: remove diagnostic test with incorrect compiler behavior
In fact the latest compiler (neither K1 nor K2) does NOT report an error
here, see KT-66522. The error was there in the diagnostic test because
the test used custom code which invoked parts of the old JVM backend to
report signature clash errors.

The issue is rather minor and is present since 1.5, so to reduce
confusion, the test is deleted.

 #KT-66522
2024-03-14 12:38:48 +00:00
Alexander Udalov d986e0ee9c Tests: move more diagnostic tests to testsWithJvmBackend
In this commit, tests where backend diagnostics were reported correctly
are being moved.

FirScopeDumpHandler was added to FIR diagnostic tests with JVM backend
to support `SCOPE_DUMP` in `overridesBuiltinNoMagic.kt` and
`charAtAndOverload.kt`.
2024-03-14 12:38:48 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 56a1a3153b Tests: move inline class-related diagnostic tests
... with backend-reported diagnostics to testsWithJvmBackend.
2024-03-14 12:38:47 +00:00
Alexander Udalov d08c904b0c Tests: copy diagnostic test to codegen/box
This is basically a copy of the test
`diagnostics/tests/j+k/primitiveOverrides/triangleWithFlexibleTypeAndSubstitution4.kt`.
The diagnostic version of the test is not removed because it has
frontend-specific diagnostics `FIR_DUMP` and `SCOPE_DUMP`.

This test is copied to make it clear that it actually passes in K1, and
new errors in K2 here are technically a breaking change, see KT-66529.
The error CONFLICTING_INHERITED_JVM_DECLARATIONS was present there only
because diagnostic tests used parts of the old JVM backend to report JVM
backend diagnostics.

 #KT-66529
2024-03-14 12:38:47 +00:00
Alexander Udalov c997e9f142 Tests: move diagnostic test to testsWithJvmBackend
There's a difference in behavior of K1 and K2 here, see KT-66528.

 #KT-66528
2024-03-14 12:38:46 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 81a9f5654e Tests: remove diagnostic tests which are present elsewhere
- `typeParameterWithTwoBounds.kt` is already present in
  `diagnostics/testsWithJvmBackend/duplicateJvmSignature/erasure/`.
- `clashWithCompanionObjectField.kt` is already present in
  `codegen/box/fieldRename/jvmFieldNoClash1.kt`.
- `jvmFieldAndJavaGetter.kt` is already present in
  `codegen/box/jvmField/noClashWithInheritedJavaMethod.kt`.

In case of two latter tests on JvmField, there's (correctly) no error
reported in JVM IR, which is why those are box tests.
2024-03-14 12:38:44 +00:00
Dmitriy Novozhilov c62fe0d107 [Test] Add regression test for KT-66336 2024-03-14 12:23:36 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 9f750d3036 [Tests] Reproduce current behavior of operator/infix resolution
#KT-66504
#KT-66453
#KT-58260
2024-03-14 11:32:38 +00:00
Nikita Bobko a8275c99a3 [FIR, IR] Check for strict subtypes during actualization
^KT-65775 Fixed
Review: https://jetbrains.team/p/kt/reviews/14906/timeline
2024-03-14 10:53:43 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow 0fec50135f [kotlin] Provide CFG facade for the extract function refactoring
This is the first implementation of a control flow graph facade for the
extract function IDE refactoring. The exact contents of
'KtDataFlowExitPointSnapshot' will be refined later.

^KT-65762 Fixed
2024-03-14 10:53:11 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow 1f39bc9a18 [Analysis API] Add tests for foreign values 2024-03-14 10:20:29 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow 2dd16e1179 [Analysis API] Fix 'getContainingDeclaration()' for foreign values
Foreign values (such as '_DebugLabel' properties contributed by the
debugger) don't have a parent (or a valid source element in general).

^KTIJ-27382 Fixed
2024-03-14 10:20:29 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow 88a85b8936 [Analysis API] Add reference tests for containing declaration provider 2024-03-14 10:20:29 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow e171e21165 [Analysis API] Minor, remove duplicating check 2024-03-14 10:20:29 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 786c37286c [FIR] Fix crash caused by cast of raw type to simple type
#KT-66552 Fixed
2024-03-14 08:42:20 +00:00
Yan Zhulanow 0147d725fb [Analysis API] Provide type mapping for callable references
Strictly speaking, callable references are not calls. However, type
arguments are still inferred for references, and 'KtCall' is the only
place in Analysis API that exposes call-substituted types.

^KT-66485 Fixed
2024-03-14 06:10:31 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 893e5cac94 Temporary: mute PRE_RELEASE_CLASS in some tests (KT-66551) 2024-03-13 20:38:44 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 1876c8a9ee [AA] Fix getKtExpressionType for augmented array assignment
This previously worked on accident because the get call in an
augmented array assignment wouldn't have a resolved argument list, and
so `argumentsToSubstitutedValueParameters` would return null.
Now, we additionally verify that we're in a `set` call.

#KT-66124
2024-03-13 17:05:48 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 8443daf78d [FIR] Remove FirNamedArgumentExpressions during completion
They are mostly necessary for argument mapping during resolution.
To support a couple checkers, we transform named args for varargs
into "fake" spread expressions.

Other than that, named arguments aren't needed for anything and often
lead to bugs where we forget to unwrap them for something, so it's
better to get rid of them.

#KT-66124
2024-03-13 17:05:48 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 03fc0fd381 [FIR] Remove FirLambdaArgumentExpression
It's not really necessary if the information about if the lambda was a
trailing lambda can be directly saved in FirAnonymousFunctionExpression.

Removing the FIR node uncovered a couple of bugs
(UNINITIALIZED_ENUM_ENTRY, ERROR_IN_CONTRACT_DESCRIPTION) that were
caused by assuming that a lambda is always a trailing lambda.

#KT-66124
2024-03-13 17:05:48 +00:00
Ivan Kylchik 61fabc02ba [K2] Resolve bodies of const properties during IMPLICIT_TYPES_BODY_RESOLVE
This is required to implement constant evaluator on the FIR level.

#KT-64151
2024-03-13 16:53:59 +00:00
Ivan Kylchik 0ebf2862a9 [K2] Add new tests on lazy resolve to check new resolve rules
In the consequent commits, there are some changes in FIR resolve.
These tests will show the difference.

#KT-64151
2024-03-13 16:53:59 +00:00
Roman Golyshev 1884a655c5 KT-66498 [AA] Provide KDoc for isSubClassOf and isDirectSubClassOf 2024-03-13 16:31:41 +00:00
Roman Golyshev c6e442c18b KT-66498 [AA] Do not consider a class to be a subclass of itself in K1 impl for isSubClassOf
^KT-66498 Fixed
2024-03-13 16:31:41 +00:00
Roman Golyshev de75297875 KT-66498 [AA] Add more tests for the isSubClassOf/isDirectSubClassOf
Also, reproduce the difference between the K1 and K2 implementation
of `isSubClassOf` for the same class
2024-03-13 16:31:41 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh d6e67e43f9 K1/K2: add a test for KT-62866 2024-03-13 14:57:34 +00:00
Mikhail Glukhikh 3b9e08d6b8 K1/K2: reproduce KT-65789 2024-03-13 14:57:33 +00:00
Roman Efremov 284d5437e5 [FIR] Don't transform call arguments during TYPES phase
Instead, it should happen during BODY_RESOLVE phase.

This fixes KT-66150. The problem was, that `super<B>.f()` expression
in delegated constructor call was transformed during TYPES phase,
and type transformer has no special logic for allowing bare types in
super qualifiers, like the one in expressions transformer (see
`org.jetbrains.kotlin.fir.resolve.transformers.body.resolve.FirExpressionsResolveTransformer.transformSuperReceiver`).
As a result, `B` without type argument leads to
WrongNumberOfTypeArgumentsError.
It looks incorrect that expressions in constructor call resolved
during TYPES phase, so skipping transformation of
argument list seems like the best solution here.

^KT-66150 Fixed
2024-03-13 14:31:14 +00:00
Roman Efremov c4f89ab32e [Test] Add test reproducing incorrect error in K2 about super qualifier
...with type arguments.
Also, add lazy resolve test to check the subsequent changes are correct.

^KT-66150
2024-03-13 14:31:14 +00:00
Kirill Rakhman 43a08068fc [Tests] Add regression tests for KT-32754
#KT-32754 Fixed
2024-03-13 12:39:54 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 55f9f74d5c Tests: do not report backend diagnostics if there's frontend error
In most affected tests, the backend diagnostic such as "conflicting JVM
signature" or "accidental override" is directly caused by some already
existing error reported by frontend, so it doesn't make sense to check
backend diagnostics there.

Tests where that was not the case were moved/copied to
`testsWithJvmBackend`.
2024-03-13 08:38:15 +00:00
Alexander Udalov dca6c21d7f Tests: remove duplicateJvmSignature diagnostic tests
All of these tests were actually copied to `testsWithJvmBackend` in
866f188120, but it's unclear why they were copied instead of moved. The
test runner for `testsWithJvmBackend` correctly runs the compiler
pipeline and obtains errors reported by the backend, as opposed to the
common diagnostic tests which have a very custom code, using parts of
the old JVM backend, to obtain these diagnostics.
2024-03-13 08:38:15 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 6ed06f4dac Tests: minor, move diagnostic test missingNames.kt
Looks like it was placed in the `duplicateJvmSignature` directory by
mistake.
2024-03-13 08:38:14 +00:00
Alexander Udalov 5be1ff1d5f Tests: minor, remove obsolete diagnostic tests
- `require.kt` was added to check JVM accidental override diagnostic
  when using the "traits with required classes" feature, which was
  removed a long time ago.
- `withErrorTypes.kt` was testing conflicting JVM declarations error (a
  backend diagnostic) in presence of error types -- not very useful
  scenario because the backend is not run when there's a frontend error.
2024-03-13 08:38:14 +00:00
Vladimir Sukharev 5fee662223 [Tests] Add test for KT-57391
^KT-57391
2024-03-12 18:10:10 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak d3dfbec01a [FIR] Report warnings for inconsistent visibilities of accessors
K1 didn't report diagnostics for accessors
of intersection overrides, so this change
prevents a BC.

^KT-66046 Fixed
2024-03-12 16:35:05 +00:00
Nikolay Lunyak daa6e03e3b [FIR] Reproduce KT-66046
^KT-66046
2024-03-12 16:35:05 +00:00
Brian Norman c6c0abae82 [FIR] Create test case to validate KT-56988 is working as expected
^KT-56988 Fixed
2024-03-12 14:48:39 +00:00