The change in `FirDiagnosticsHandler` ensures
`DEBUG_INFO_DYNAMIC` is still reported in
`FirPsiJsOldFrontendDiagnosticsTestGenerated.testConventions`.
Support `SPREAD_OPERATOR_IN_DYNAMIC_CALL` and
`WRONG_OPERATION_WITH_DYNAMIC`
tl;dr the current design of klibs does not allow to properly deserialize
the list of sealed subclasses in a sound way. It is possible that
a subclass of a sealed class is declared in a different file, AND is
private in that file.
A more detailed explanation:
Right now we don't serialize file signatures at all.
However, a private declaration's signature must necessarily include
the file signature.
How do we serialize a private declaration's signature into a klib
and deserialize it later?
**Serialization** is simple: we just serialize the file signature as
an empty protobuf message.
When we are **deserializing** a private declaration, we look at the file
that is being deserialized right now, and construct the file signature
based on that.
This logic, however, doesn't always work. An example is KT-54028.
Basically, if we have a sealed interface with a private implementor
declared in a different file, this breaks:
1. We are deserializing the sealed interface. The deserializer knows
that we are now in the file in which the sealed interface is declared.
2. As part of deserializing the interface, we deserialize its sealed
subclasses.
3. Naturally, we come to deserializing the private implementor that is
declared in another file, but the deserializer still thinks that we are
in the file in which the interface is declared. A wrong signature is
created, which leads to linkage failure.
We *could* fix this by properly serializing the file signature,
i.e. instead of an empty protobuf message we could write the file path
and its package to the klib. However, there a problems with this
approach:
- The current design of signatures allows a situation where two
different files can have the same relative path
(for example, with the help of the `-Xklib-relative-path-base` compiler
flag) *and* the same package, which would introduce ambiguity during
linkage.
- Most importantly, this appoach won't work well with incremental
compilation of klibs. Currently we rely on the assumption that all
cross-file references are handled with public signatures, and private
signatures are only used inside a single file. This allows to move
declarations across files without recompiling it's use sites.
It has been decided to apply the following hacky solution: we just don't
deserialize the list of sealed subclasses from klibs.
The list of sealed subclasses is not used in lowerings, so it should be
safe.
#KT-54028 Fixed
Add a special annotation @JsExternalInheritorsOnly for marking
external interfaces and classes. The marked interface or class
can’t be a parent for non external interfaces, classes or objects.
^KT-57423 Fixed
In K1 .isFun is always false for Java classes, so extra check
is added for that. This is not needed for K2, because .isFun is
true for all Java classes. Here it is not necessary to check
that interface has only one method, because such check will be
done in the place where interface implementation is created.
^KT-39362 Fixed
Since we put object's hash code in toString, we end up in putting
non-stable hash code to constant table, which leads to unstable
binaries.
#KTI-1193 Fixed
Result of the `checkNotNull` calls should always be a non-nullable
values.
The simplest idea how to acheive it is adding not-nullable Any bound
to the type parameter declaration.
Existing comment stating about impossibility of such bound seems to be
not 100% correct because it doesn't take into account presence of
definitely-non-nullable X & Any types that allow described case with
nullable generic.
^KT-55804 Fixed
If dispatch receiver is dynamic and call on it is not dynamic that means
that this call was resolved to some specific declaration because of
smartcast. So we should use original type of this declaration as
dispatch receiver during calculation of IdSignature instead of Any
(which came from dynamic type). Otherwise we will have two different
signatures for the same member declaration
^KT-57682 Fixed
fix checking for intersection types in CheckIncompatibleTypeVariableUpperBounds
we need this resolve, because getEmptyIntersectionTypeKind under
the hood uses org.jetbrains.kotlin.resolve.checkers.EmptyIntersectionTypeChecker.computeEmptyIntersectionEmptiness
which uses computeByHavingCommonSubtype where we have
isFinalClassConstructor() call, so we need to resolve to STATUS phase
to get the correct modality
^KT-56543
The compiler should only report diagnostics for
comparisons over builtins and identity-less types,
other incompatibilities should be reported
via inspections.
It's ok that in `equalityChecksOnIntegerTypes`
instead of `EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE_WARNING` we get
`EQUALITY_NOT_APPLICABLE`, because
`ProperEqualityChecksInBuilderInferenceCalls`
is already active by default.
This change also replaces the notion of a representative superclass
with the least upper bound.
This makes complex types like
intersection/flexible transparent to
RULES1-based compatibility checks.
One way to look at it is to think
that this is an automatic way of handling
type parameters: automatic picking of
"interesting" bounds, and checking them against one another.
Note that `TypeIntersector.intersectTypes`
for `Int` and `T` where `T` is a type parameter
may return both `{Int & T}` or `null`
depending on `T`-s bounds. At the same time,
for type parameters `T` and `K` it will
always return `{T & K}`.
`ConeTypeIntersector.intersectTypes`, on the
other hand, will always return `{Int & T}`
irrespectively of the bounds. Meaning, the two
intersectors differ in corner cases.
`lowerBoundIfFlexible` call in `isLiterallyTypeParameter` is backed by
the `equalityOfFlexibleTypeParameters` test.
^KT-35134 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-22499 #fixed-in-k2
^KT-46383 #fixed-in-k2
This is the way it works in K1.
See `OverloadingConflictResolver.kt:345`.
^KT-57568 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-9395
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Ivan Kochurkin