There is one of checks left unimplemented (FirParcelizePropertyChecker.checkParcelableClassProperty)
because it requires huge commonization of detecting which type can be
serialized and which not, which is not prioritized job for now
Methods `needToGenerateAdditionalMembersInClass` and
`needToGenerateNestedClassifiersInClass` are removed, now compiler
uses `get...Names` and `getTopLevel...` methods to determine which
extension may generate declaration with specific classId/callableId
This is needed to simplify API of FirDeclarationGenerationExtension and
provide guarantee that `generate...` method will be called with
specific classId/callableId only if specific extensions returned name
for this id from `getName...` functions
Existed code might lose declarations in two cases:
1. When there is a declared function which is mapped to property
(java synthetic properties)
2. When class has property and function with same name
This is needed for two reasons:
1. Before this change companion object appeared in FirRegularClass
twice: in declarations list and in companionObject field. This may
trigger twice transform of it
2. It's very hard to implement generation of companion object by plugins
because if it is part of the tree then generated declaration must be
registered in FirProvider, which is inconsistent with other generated
declarations. Replacing FIR with symbol and removing custom logic of
visiting/transforming companion FIR allows us to just replace companionSymbol
in FirClass if plugin wants to generate it without any additional work
If some java class has multiple supertypes then we need to collect
overriddens from all those types directly, even if superTypeScope
(which is FirTypeIntersectionScope in this case) returns only
one symbol from one of this types (not intersection one)
This is needed to proper enhancement in cases when some type occurs
multiple times in supertypes graph with different nullability
of arguments:
class ConcurrentHashMap<K, V> : AbstractMap<K!, V!>, MutableMap<K, V>
If we try to find method `get(key: K): V` supertype scope returns
`AbstractMap.get(key: K!): V!` (because it actually overrides
`MutableMap(key: K): V?`), but we need to get both symbols to
properly enhance types for `ConcurrentHashMap.remove`
This is needed for debug purposes, because without classId or reference
to class it's very hard to understand which scope you are observing
in debugger
Dmitriy Novozhilov