ARGUMENTS_OF_ANNOTATIONS will be dropped, so this check should be moved
This commit also drops class annotations resolution from implicit type
phase and provides the correct scope during argument mapping phase.
This code was effectively unreachable before
^KT-62679
`implicitScope` can be `null`
in case when the implicit receiver resides in a user-defined `kotlin.*`
package, but the user have not yet allowed this with compiler argument
directive.
In this case,
we don't want the IDE to crush and show exceptions - the `kotlin`
package would be highlighted by the compiler diagnostics and other
resolve problems, and that would be enough
^KT-62071 Fixed
The commit (7db2fc522e) with changing behavior of builtin symbol provider
is in a conflict with a commit (72de86a8ba) where new tests were added.
The difference should be fixed as a part of KT-62651
The root cause of the problem is that we visit class annotations more
accurately than in the regular compiler transformer, so we have
a difference: the compiler assumes that annotation processing
of the class is called already inside this class, so it should enable
CLASS_HEADER_ANNOTATIONS mode to not capture extra context.
But we in LL FIR do this out of the class, so such context switching
is redundant and results in cutting out the outer class context
^KT-62587 Fixed
This call is redundant for annotation transformers because
they are override withRegularClass and add this call there,
so, as result, we have a class duplication in
containingClassDeclarations
^KT-62587
StubBasedBuiltInsSymbolProvider does not work for now for common modules (KT-61757)
but compiler builtins provider `FirBuiltinSymbolProvider` works.
Also, stub-based symbol providers should not be used in standalone mode.
Testdata from standalone is updated because of the difference
in property accessors (KT-62449) between stub and compiler builtin symbol providers.
Additionally, this commit fixes the behavior of `KotlinStaticPsiDeclarationFromBinaryModuleProvider`.
As compiler builtin declarations have no PSI attached,
`KotlinStaticPsiDeclarationFromBinaryModuleProvider` is used to get PSI
from `DecompiledPsiDeclarationProvider.findPsi`.
`DecompiledPsiDeclarationProvider` is only used in UAST standalone mode.
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-59916/K2-Disappeared-REPEATEDANNOTATION
FirAnnotationChecker does not detect repeated annotation on dynamic type, since FirTypeResolverImpl wrongly did not convert source annotations to attributes of ConeDynamicType.
This MR improves FirTypeResolverImpl to convert attributes of FirDynamicTypeRef to annotations and attach them to ConeDynamicType.
Merge-request: KT-MR-12551
Merged-by: Vladimir Sukharev <Vladimir.Sukharev@jetbrains.com>
If you want to shorten call like `foo.bar()` into `bar()`, then you
need your range to intersect with `bar` callee reference. Having only
`foo` in the range is not enough
Same goes for the type references - to shorten `foo.Bar` into `Bar`, you
need at least some intersection of your range with `Bar` reference
^KTIJ-27139 Fixed
^KTIJ-27015 Fixed
It's effectively a breaking change (^KT-62558)
K2 assigns flexible type to all static fields (from Java) and, for example,
`String? becomes String unlike K1. It affects IR signature generating.
That's why signature dump is disabled for some tests.
^KT-57811 Fixed
^KT-61786 Fixed
Such properties should be stateless and just wrap over accessories.
Logic inside contract transformer is unreachable because we do not
allow lazy resolution for synthetic properties.
^KT-61990
In Kotlin subclasses of `MutableCollection<Int>`, the method
`remove(Int)` has its argument boxed, so that it wouldn't clash with the
method from `java.util.List`. So `JavaOverrideChecker` should understand
that a Java method `boolean remove(java.lang.Integer)` overrides it,
otherwise platform declaration clash was reported.
The code is adapted from `forceSingleValueParameterBoxing` in K1's
`methodSignatureMapping.kt`.
The test has been moved and adapted from diagnostic to codegen box
tests, to check correct backend execution + runtime.
#KT-62316 Fixed
if property doesn't specify explicit type,
property's return type would be calculated by provided initializer
^KT-62588 fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-12564
Merged-by: Anna Kozlova <Anna.Kozlova@jetbrains.com>
Dmitrii Gridin