Synthesized 'copy' introduces default values for parameters, which is
prohibited for regular overrides.
Report warning in language version 1.2-, error in 1.3+.
- do not allow it to be used together with JvmMultifileClass (otherwise
implementation becomes complex)
- do not allow to declare classes in a JvmPackageName-annotated file
(similarly, the implementation of this would be much harder in the
compiler, and there would need to be special support in the IDE)
- check that the value is a valid FQ name
- do not allow root package just in case
The main changes are in jvm_package_table.proto and ModuleMapping.kt.
With JvmPackageName, package parts can now have a JVM package name that
differs from their Kotlin name. So, in addition to the old package parts
which were stored as short names + short name of multifile facade (we
can't change this because of compatibility with old compilers), we now
store separately those package parts, which have a different JVM package
name. The format is optimized to avoid storing any package name more
than once as a string.
Another notable change is in KotlinCliJavaFileManagerImpl, where we now
load .kotlin_module files when determining whether or not a package
exists. Before this change, no PsiPackage (and thus, no JavaPackage and
eventually, no LazyJavaPackageFragment) was created unless there was at
least one file in the corresponding directory. Now we also create
packages if they are "mapped" to other JVM packages, i.e. if all package
parts in them have been annotated with JvmPackageName.
Most of the other changes are refactorings to allow internal names of
package parts/multifile classes where previously there were only short
names.
This annotation is currently internal because we only commit to its
support for our own libraries. It will be used to change JVM package
names of declarations in JDK-specific stdlib additions (now called
kotlin-stdlib-jre7/8), both to preserve source compatibility of the old
Kotlin code and to solve the split package problem (KT-19258)
Before this change, we were computing the visibility of an inherited
private property setter, and ISE at AsmUtil.getVisibilityAccessFlag
happened ("invisible_fake is not a valid visibility in backend")
Search abstract members in unsubstituted scope to avoid computation
of substituted descriptors for each type (effectively for each SAM call)
#KT-20055 In progress
It might be helpful for performance as these methods are called
for each resolution candidate and in the same time they scan
the whole overridden tree of a callable member
Dmitry Petrov