Invert the logic of IR/FIR2IR-based generators: change the CLI argument
to -Xuse-fir-fake-override-builder, test directive to
USE_FIR_BASED_FAKE_OVERRIDE_GENERATOR, etc.
The changes in test data caused by using IR fake override builder by
default are in the subsequent commit.
#KT-61514
Checker for conflicting declarations will now check for the following
scenarios too
- two expect declarations in different modules
- actual and non-expect declarations in different modules
^KT-63826 Fixed
If there is an expression receiver, we should process constructors only
of inner classes. Constructors of nested classes can be called only
on classifier
^KT-65333 Fixed
This is an addition to d4278250e6. Apparently we still need to produce
a new fake override for each inherited static member, because otherwise
we would try to determine the most specific return type, maximum
visibility, etc, all of which makes no sense for static members.
#KT-66152 Fixed
This diagnostic is reported in rare situations when
StubTypeForBuilderInference is kept as a parameter type
of for loop or lambda. Before this commit, we had in K1
"Could not load module <error module>" from IrLinker instead.
Related to: KT-52757, KT-53109, KT-63841, KT-64066
#KT-53478 Fixed
Usually we create synthetic property in java class if there is a property
from the base kotlin class and getter/setter with a corresponding name
in the declared scope or one of supertype scopes. But there is a case,
where the same supertype contains both property and getter:
```
// FILE: Base.kt
open class Base {
open val b = "O"
@JvmName("getBJava")
fun getB() : String = "K"
}
// FILE: Derived.java
public class Derived extends Base {}
```
In this case we shouldn't create synthetic property, because `getB()`
function is invisible for `Derived` class
^KT-66020 Fixed
... when the expected type is not a function type.
Instead set it to a new type variable.
This fixes a bunch of false negative CANNOT_INFER_PARAMETER_TYPE.
#KT-59882 Fixed
Generally the wrapping anonymous initializer can be used as a
"containing declaration" for some elements, but since the initialiser
for the last script expression could be dropped (the expression could
be converted to the result property), this may lead to the surprises,
e.g. as described in KT-65984
This fix marks the last initialiser as local, preventing it from being
referenced as "containing declaration".
#KT-65984
The problem was that in K2 for some top-level script declarations we
need to add a dispatch receiver parameter (because frontend do not
assign any, but representing script as a class requires it to be the
script class) and at the same time, calls to these declarations rely on
properly set dispatch receiver parameter.
The simplest solution found is to have an additional traversal on the
relevan top-level declarations and assigning the dispatch receiver,
before running the main transformation.
#KT-64502 fixed
It should have been already implemented as intrinsic in all backends.
Do not test enumEntries intrinsic in the old JVM BE.
KT-53154
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <alexander.udalov@jetbrains.com>
Alexander Udalov