[Gradle, JS] Add comment why we use project.provider and not use single
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Space Team
parent
1dbb227de2
commit
f9ffe67430
+8
-1
@@ -28,9 +28,16 @@ internal open class KotlinJsIrLinkConfig(
|
||||
|
||||
task.dependsOn(compilation.compileTaskProvider)
|
||||
task.dependsOn(compilation.output.classesDirs)
|
||||
// We still support Gradle 6.8 in tests
|
||||
// Gradle 6.8 has a bug with verifying of not getting provider before Task execution
|
||||
task.entryModule.fileProvider(
|
||||
task.project.providers.provider {
|
||||
compilation.output.classesDirs.elements.get().single().asFile
|
||||
val elements = compilation.output.classesDirs.elements.get()
|
||||
elements.singleOrNull()?.asFile
|
||||
?: throw IllegalStateException(
|
||||
"Only one output fo compilation expected," +
|
||||
"but actual: ${elements.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]") { it.toString() }}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
).disallowChanges()
|
||||
task.rootCacheDirectory.set(project.layout.buildDirectory.map { it.dir("klib/cache/js/${binary.name}") })
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user