removed check for 'hasNext' val in frontend

This commit is contained in:
Svetlana Isakova
2012-08-20 16:05:16 +04:00
parent f72fb51a55
commit f817eba7aa
8 changed files with 8 additions and 37 deletions
@@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ public interface Errors {
DiagnosticFactory1<JetSimpleNameExpression, ClassifierDescriptor> NO_CLASS_OBJECT = DiagnosticFactory1.create(ERROR);
SimpleDiagnosticFactory<PsiElement> NO_GENERICS_IN_SUPERTYPE_SPECIFIER = SimpleDiagnosticFactory.create(ERROR);
SimpleDiagnosticFactory<JetExpression> HAS_NEXT_PROPERTY_AND_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY = SimpleDiagnosticFactory.create(ERROR);
SimpleDiagnosticFactory<JetExpression> HAS_NEXT_MISSING = SimpleDiagnosticFactory.create(ERROR);
SimpleDiagnosticFactory<JetExpression> HAS_NEXT_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY = SimpleDiagnosticFactory.create(ERROR);
SimpleDiagnosticFactory<JetExpression> HAS_NEXT_MUST_BE_READABLE = SimpleDiagnosticFactory.create(ERROR);
@@ -228,8 +228,6 @@ public class DefaultErrorMessages {
MAP.put(NO_CLASS_OBJECT, "Please specify constructor invocation; classifier ''{0}'' does not have a class object", NAME);
MAP.put(NO_GENERICS_IN_SUPERTYPE_SPECIFIER, "Generic arguments of the base type must be specified");
MAP.put(HAS_NEXT_PROPERTY_AND_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY,
"An ambiguity between 'iterator().hasNext()' function and 'iterator().hasNext' property");
MAP.put(HAS_NEXT_MISSING, "Loop range must have an 'iterator().hasNext()' function or an 'iterator().hasNext' property");
MAP.put(HAS_NEXT_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY, "Function 'iterator().hasNext()' is ambiguous for this expression");
MAP.put(HAS_NEXT_MUST_BE_READABLE, "The 'iterator().hasNext' property of the loop range must be readable");
@@ -327,17 +327,11 @@ public class ControlStructureTypingVisitor extends ExpressionTypingVisitor {
JetType iteratorType = iteratorFunction.getReturnType();
FunctionDescriptor hasNextFunction = checkHasNextFunctionSupport(loopRangeExpression, iteratorType, context);
boolean hasNextFunctionSupported = hasNextFunction != null;
VariableDescriptor hasNextProperty = checkHasNextPropertySupport(loopRangeExpression, iteratorType, context);
boolean hasNextPropertySupported = hasNextProperty != null;
if (hasNextFunctionSupported && hasNextPropertySupported && !ErrorUtils.isErrorType(iteratorType)) {
// TODO : overload resolution rules impose priorities here???
context.trace.report(HAS_NEXT_PROPERTY_AND_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY.on(loopRangeExpression));
}
else if (!hasNextFunctionSupported && !hasNextPropertySupported) {
if (!hasNextFunctionSupported) {
context.trace.report(HAS_NEXT_MISSING.on(loopRangeExpression));
}
else {
context.trace.record(LOOP_RANGE_HAS_NEXT, loopRange.getExpression(), hasNextFunctionSupported ? hasNextFunction : hasNextProperty);
context.trace.record(LOOP_RANGE_HAS_NEXT, loopRange.getExpression(), hasNextFunction);
}
OverloadResolutionResults<FunctionDescriptor> nextResolutionResults = context.resolveExactSignature(new TransientReceiver(iteratorType), Name.identifier("next"), Collections.<JetType>emptyList());
@@ -388,25 +382,6 @@ public class ControlStructureTypingVisitor extends ExpressionTypingVisitor {
return hasNextResolutionResults.getResultingCall().getResultingDescriptor();
}
@Nullable
private static VariableDescriptor checkHasNextPropertySupport(@NotNull JetExpression loopRange, @NotNull JetType iteratorType, ExpressionTypingContext context) {
VariableDescriptor hasNextProperty = DescriptorUtils.filterNonExtensionProperty(iteratorType.getMemberScope().getProperties(Name.identifier("hasNext")));
if (hasNextProperty == null) {
return null;
}
else {
JetType hasNextReturnType = hasNextProperty.getType();
if (hasNextReturnType == null) {
// TODO : accessibility
context.trace.report(HAS_NEXT_MUST_BE_READABLE.on(loopRange));
}
else if (!isBoolean(hasNextReturnType)) {
context.trace.report(HAS_NEXT_PROPERTY_TYPE_MISMATCH.on(loopRange, hasNextReturnType));
}
}
return hasNextProperty;
}
@Override
public JetTypeInfo visitTryExpression(JetTryExpression expression, ExpressionTypingContext context) {
JetExpression tryBlock = expression.getTryBlock();
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
fun <T : Any> T?.iterator() = object {
var hasNext = this@iterator != null
private set
fun hasNext() = hasNext
fun next() : T {
if (hasNext) {
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
import java.util.*;
class NotRange1() {
@@ -82,12 +81,11 @@ fun test(notRange1: NotRange1, notRange2: NotRange2, notRange3: NotRange3, notRa
for (i in <!NEXT_MISSING!>notRange3<!>);
for (i in <!HAS_NEXT_MISSING!>notRange4<!>);
for (i in <!HAS_NEXT_FUNCTION_TYPE_MISMATCH!>notRange5<!>);
for (i in <!HAS_NEXT_PROPERTY_AND_FUNCTION_AMBIGUITY!>notRange6<!>);
for (i in notRange6);
for (i in <!HAS_NEXT_FUNCTION_TYPE_MISMATCH!>notRange7<!>);
for (i in <!HAS_NEXT_MISSING!>notRange8<!>);
for (i in range0);
for (i in range1);
for (i in (ArrayList<Int>() : List<Int>));
}
}
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ inline fun <T> java.util.Enumeration<T>.iterator() = object: Iterator<T> {
fun <T : Any> T?.iterator() = object {
var hasNext = this@iterator != null
private set
fun hasNext() = hasNext
fun next() : T {
if (hasNext) {
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ fun test(notRange1: NotRange1, notRange2: NotRange2, notRange3: NotRange3, notRa
for (i in <error>notRange3</error>);
for (i in <error>notRange4</error>);
for (i in <error>notRange5</error>);
for (i in <error>notRange6</error>);
for (i in notRange6);
for (i in <error>notRange7</error>);
for (i in range0);
for (i in range1);
@@ -12,8 +12,7 @@ class SimpleEnumerator {
}
class SimpleEnumeratorWrapper(private val enumerator: SimpleEnumerator) {
val hasNext: Boolean
get() = enumerator.hasMoreElements()
fun hasNext(): Boolean = enumerator.hasMoreElements()
fun next() = enumerator.getNext()
}