[JS IR] Improve the test for exporting protected members
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ open class Foo protected constructor() {
|
||||
_baz = value
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
protected val bazReadOnly: String
|
||||
get() = _baz
|
||||
|
||||
protected val quux: String = "quux"
|
||||
|
||||
protected var quuz: String = "quuz"
|
||||
|
||||
protected class NestedClass {
|
||||
val prop: String = "nested class property"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -37,9 +44,15 @@ function box() {
|
||||
foo = new exportProtectedMembers.Foo();
|
||||
|
||||
if (foo.bar() != 'protected method') return 'failed to call protected method';
|
||||
if (foo.baz != 'baz') return 'failed to read protected property';
|
||||
if (foo.baz != 'baz') return 'failed to read `baz`';
|
||||
if (foo.bazReadOnly != 'baz') return 'failed to read `bazReadOnly`';
|
||||
foo.baz = 'beer';
|
||||
if (foo.baz != 'beer') return 'failed to write protected property';
|
||||
if (foo.baz != 'beer') return 'failed to write protected var';
|
||||
if (foo.bazReadOnly != 'beer') return 'unexpected value of `bazReadOnly` after modifying `baz`';
|
||||
if (foo.quux != 'quux') return 'failed to read `quux`';
|
||||
if (foo.quuz != 'quuz') return 'failed to read `quuz`';
|
||||
foo.quuz = 'ale';
|
||||
if (foo.quuz != 'ale') return 'failed to write `quuz`';
|
||||
|
||||
nestedClass = new exportProtectedMembers.Foo.NestedClass()
|
||||
if (nestedClass.prop != 'nested class property')
|
||||
@@ -50,4 +63,4 @@ function box() {
|
||||
return 'failed to read protected companion object property'
|
||||
|
||||
return 'OK';
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user