Nikolay Lunyak
fa600a58ac
Running the `FirScriptCodegenTestGenerated.testSecondLevelFunction` test results in "Expected is `FirResolvedDeclarationStatus`, but was `FirDeclarationStatusImpl`. This is similar to the `FirIdeNormalAnalysisSourceModuleCodeFragmentCollectDiagnosticsTestGenerated.testLocalFunction` test, but that one was fixed by `9514f8f8`. Looks like the situation here is the same, it's just `FirScript` that needs to be fixed. The changed regarding the approximation is needed to avoid exposing the anonymous type in `FirScriptLazyDeclarationResolveTestGenerated.testDelegatesScript`. The difference in the `ScriptInBlockModificationTestGenerated.testRawContractScript` test appeared because previously the contract used to be `FirRawContractDescription`, but it now resolves to `FirEmptyContractDescription`.
10 lines
732 B
Plaintext
10 lines
732 B
Plaintext
BEFORE MODIFICATION:
|
|
public final [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] fun foo([ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] arg: R|kotlin/Any?|, [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] num: R|kotlin/Int?|, [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] block: R|() -> kotlin/Unit|): R|kotlin/Unit| {
|
|
<Unresolved name: require>#((R|<local>/arg| is R|kotlin/String|))
|
|
<Unresolved name: require>#(!=(R|<local>/num|, Null(null)))
|
|
R|<local>/block|.R|SubstitutionOverride<kotlin/Function0.invoke: R|kotlin/Unit|>|()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
AFTER MODIFICATION:
|
|
public final [ResolvedTo(ANNOTATIONS_ARGUMENTS_MAPPING)] fun foo([ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] arg: R|kotlin/Any?|, [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] num: R|kotlin/Int?|, [ResolvedTo(BODY_RESOLVE)] block: R|() -> kotlin/Unit|): R|kotlin/Unit| { LAZY_BLOCK }
|