Tianyu Geng
e1b542314a
There is some behavior change regarding the new WrapWithSafeLetCall quickfix
1. it now works correctly on binary expressions by wrapping it with `()`
2. it now looks for a nullable position upward and do the modification there,
if possible. For example, consider the following code
```
fun bar(s: String): String = s
fun test(s: String?) {
bar(bar(bar(<caret>s)))
}
```
After applying this fix, FE1.0 yields
```
bar(bar(s?.let { bar(it) }))
```
while the new implementation yields
```
s?.let { bar(bar(bar(it))) }
```
This behavior aligns with FE1.0 if `bar` accepts nullable values.
8 lines
187 B
Kotlin
Vendored
8 lines
187 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// "Wrap with '?.let { ... }' call" "true"
|
|
// WITH_RUNTIME
|
|
|
|
fun foo(x: String?, y: String) {
|
|
y.let { bar(<caret>x, it) }
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun bar(s: String, t: String) = s.hashCode() + t.hashCode() |