7cd55c85e6
* JVM incorrectly mapped T<KClass<...>> to T<Class<...>> because the annotation-ness of the type mapping mode was inherited one level down into a generic signature independent of T * JVM_IR was even worse as it did not use VALUE_FOR_ANNOTATION at all, mapping T<T<KClass<...>> to T<T<Class<...>> as well. The correct behavior is to map KClass to Class only at top level or as an argument of Array.