Mads Ager
6622846bc1
Putting them in the local variable table means that the debugger needs to have special handling for parameters with specific names. That forces us to generate mangled names for these. Instead of also implementing the name mangling for FIR, this change gets rid of the parameters from the LVT instead.
36 lines
1.2 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
36 lines
1.2 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_RUNTIME
|
|
data class Data(val x: String, val y: Int, val z: Int = 0)
|
|
|
|
suspend fun test() {
|
|
foo(Data("A", 1)) { str, (x, _, z), i ->
|
|
println(str + x + z + i + this)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
suspend fun foo(data: Data, body: suspend Long.(String, Data, Int) -> Unit) {
|
|
1L.body("OK", data, 1)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The JVM and IR backend differ in naming scheme of captured receiver paramters in suspend lambdas
|
|
|
|
// METHOD : ParametersKt$test$2.invokeSuspend(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
|
|
|
|
// JVM_TEMPLATES
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=$this$foo TYPE=J INDEX=2
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=str TYPE=Ljava/lang/String; INDEX=4
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=$dstr$x$_u24__u24$z TYPE=LData; INDEX=5
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=i TYPE=I INDEX=6
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=x TYPE=Ljava/lang/String; INDEX=7
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=z TYPE=I INDEX=8
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=this TYPE=LParametersKt$test$2; INDEX=0
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=$result TYPE=Ljava/lang/Object; INDEX=1
|
|
|
|
// JVM_IR_TEMPLATES
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=$result TYPE=Ljava/lang/Object; INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=$this$foo TYPE=J INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=i TYPE=I INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=str TYPE=Ljava/lang/String; INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=this TYPE=LParametersKt$test$2; INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=x TYPE=Ljava/lang/String; INDEX=*
|
|
// VARIABLE : NAME=z TYPE=I INDEX=*
|