Denis Zharkov
edbf360852
The reason is that while there are optimizations for them definition of their state is both rather simple and may be confusing in testData
61 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Vendored
61 lines
2.4 KiB
Plaintext
Vendored
== foo ==
|
|
fun foo() {
|
|
"before"
|
|
class A(val x: Int) {
|
|
init {
|
|
val a = x
|
|
}
|
|
fun foo() {
|
|
val b = x
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
"after"
|
|
}
|
|
---------------------
|
|
L0:
|
|
1 <START> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
2 mark({ "before" class A(val x: Int) { init { val a = x } fun foo() { val b = x } } "after" })
|
|
mark("before")
|
|
r("before") -> <v0>
|
|
jmp?(L2)
|
|
v(val x: Int) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
magic[FAKE_INITIALIZER](val x: Int) -> <v1> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
w(x|<v1>) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
3 mark({ val a = x }) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
v(val a = x) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
magic[IMPLICIT_RECEIVER](x) -> <v2> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
r(x|<v2>) -> <v3>
|
|
w(a|<v3>) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
2 jmp?(L3) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
d(fun foo() { val b = x }) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
L2 [after local class]:
|
|
L3 [after local declaration]:
|
|
mark("after")
|
|
r("after") -> <v4>
|
|
L1:
|
|
1 <END>
|
|
error:
|
|
<ERROR>
|
|
sink:
|
|
<SINK> USE: in: {} out: {}
|
|
=====================
|
|
== foo ==
|
|
fun foo() {
|
|
val b = x
|
|
}
|
|
---------------------
|
|
L4:
|
|
3 <START> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
4 mark({ val b = x })
|
|
v(val b = x) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
magic[IMPLICIT_RECEIVER](x) -> <v0> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
r(x|<v0>) -> <v1>
|
|
w(b|<v1>) INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
L5:
|
|
3 <END> INIT: in: {} out: {}
|
|
error:
|
|
<ERROR>
|
|
sink:
|
|
<SINK> USE: in: {} out: {}
|
|
=====================
|