Sergej Jaskiewicz
6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
26 lines
724 B
Kotlin
Vendored
26 lines
724 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived|null[0]
|
|
class Derived : Base {
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived{}ref
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived.ref|-1081516401990928556[0]
|
|
val ref: KMutableProperty0<String?>
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived#<get-ref>(){}kotlin.reflect.KMutableProperty0<kotlin.String?>
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived.ref.<get-ref>|-6985556442168523841[0]
|
|
get
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived#<init>(){}
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived.<init>|-5645683436151566731[0]
|
|
constructor() /* primary */
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived#set(){}
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived.set|-7365752122041802629[0]
|
|
fun set(): Unit
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|