Files
kotlin-fork/compiler/testData/cfg-variables/lexicalScopes/forScope.instructions
T
Denis Zharkov 02b40326cc Fix incorrect coroutines codegen behavior
If all the suspension calls in a suspend function were "hidden"
under the for-convention (iterator/next/hasNext) calls,
control-flow didn't find them, thus supposing that there is no
suspension points and there is no need to generate a coroutine state machine

The solution is to add relevant calls to CFG

 #KT-15824 Fixed
2017-01-25 13:54:01 +03:00

50 lines
2.0 KiB
Plaintext
Vendored

== foo ==
fun foo() {
"before"
for (i in 1..10) {
val a = i
}
"after"
}
---------------------
L0:
1 <START> INIT: in: {} out: {}
2 mark({ "before" for (i in 1..10) { val a = i } "after" })
mark("before")
r("before") -> <v0> USE: in: {} out: {}
3 r(1) -> <v1>
r(10) -> <v2>
mark(1..10)
call(1..10, rangeTo|<v1>, <v2>) -> <v3>
mark(1..10)
call(1..10, iterator|<v3>) -> <v4>
v(i) INIT: in: {} out: {i=D}
L2 [loop entry point]:
L6 [condition entry point]:
mark(1..10) INIT: in: {i=I?D} out: {i=I?D}
call(1..10, hasNext) -> <v5>
jmp?(L3)
mark(1..10)
call(1..10, next) -> <v6>
magic[LOOP_RANGE_ITERATION](1..10|<v6>) -> <v7>
w(i|<v7>) INIT: in: {i=I?D} out: {i=ID}
mark(for (i in 1..10) { val a = i }) INIT: in: {i=ID} out: {i=ID}
L4 [body entry point]:
4 mark({ val a = i })
v(val a = i) INIT: in: {i=ID} out: {a=D, i=ID}
r(i) -> <v8> INIT: in: {a=D, i=ID} out: {a=D, i=ID}
w(a|<v8>) INIT: in: {a=D, i=ID} out: {a=ID, i=ID}
3 jmp(L2) INIT: in: {i=ID} out: {i=ID} USE: in: {i=READ} out: {i=READ}
L3 [loop exit point]:
L5 [body exit point]:
read (Unit) INIT: in: {i=I?D} out: {i=I?D}
2 mark("after") INIT: in: {} out: {}
r("after") -> <v9>
L1:
1 <END>
error:
<ERROR>
sink:
<SINK> USE: in: {} out: {}
=====================