Mads Ager
e943d76266
The difference is that JVM_IR generates line numbers for the
constructor field initialization.
In this case:
```
29: class B {
30: // comment
31: val bPropVal: Int,
32: // comment
33: var bProbVar: Int
34: ) {
```
the line numbers for the field initializations are 31 and 33 where
in the current backend the whole constructor has line number 29.
48 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Vendored
48 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
Vendored
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:5
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:8
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:18
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:21
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:31
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:33
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:45
|
|
KotlinFieldBreakpoint created at fwBackingField.kt:48
|
|
Run Java
|
|
Connected to the target VM
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:18
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:21
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:59
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:5
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:8
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:59
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:11
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:12
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:13
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:60
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:24
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:25
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:26
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:61
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:31
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:33
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:61
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:36
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:37
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:38
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:62
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:45
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:48
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:62
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:42
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:45
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:51
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:42
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:48
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:52
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:42
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:48
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:54
|
|
fwBackingField.kt:63
|
|
Disconnected from the target VM
|
|
|
|
Process finished with exit code 0
|