Alexander Korepanov
5da4d31d37
- Fix a false positive JS_NAME_CLASH report on constructors from different classes but with the same JsName. - Allow the same JsName for class constructors and other top-level declarations. This behavior differs from K1, but it is correct since there is no real name clash in the generated JS code. ^KT-64867 Fixed
12 lines
486 B
Kotlin
Vendored
12 lines
486 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// FIR_DIFFERENCE
|
|
// K1 performs a check for legacy JS BE; however, this is not relevant for IR BE because in the generated JS code,
|
|
// there is no name clash between the constructor with JsName and the other top-level declarations with the same JsName.
|
|
// Keep K1 as it is, but for K2, implement a more relevant check without the clash.
|
|
package foo
|
|
|
|
class A(val x: String) {
|
|
@JsName("aa") <!JS_NAME_CLASH!>constructor(x: Int)<!> : this("int $x")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
<!JS_NAME_CLASH!>fun aa()<!> {}
|