pyos
7ce5556de3
The condition on the relationship between the current class and the type of the receiver for protected members was the opposite of what the JVMS says, and yet somehow mostly worked? #KT-48331 Fixed #KT-20542 Fixed
26 lines
461 B
Kotlin
Vendored
26 lines
461 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
// FILE: foo.kt
|
|
package foo
|
|
|
|
abstract class Base {
|
|
protected abstract fun foo(): String
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: bar.kt
|
|
import foo.*
|
|
|
|
abstract class C : Base() {
|
|
class A : C() {
|
|
override fun foo() = "OK"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class B(val x: C) : C() {
|
|
// Needs an accessor (`foo` is in another package and `x` is not assignable to `B`)
|
|
override fun foo() = x.foo()
|
|
|
|
fun bar() = foo()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box() = C.B(C.A()).bar()
|