Ivan Kylchik
c7435ba760
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
52 lines
1.3 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
52 lines
1.3 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
|
|
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// FULL_JDK
|
|
|
|
@file:JvmName("XYZ")
|
|
import java.lang.reflect.Modifier
|
|
|
|
private const val privateConst: Int = 1
|
|
public const val publicConst: Int = 3
|
|
|
|
public object A {
|
|
private const val privateConst: Int = 1
|
|
public const val publicConst: Int = 3
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public class B {
|
|
companion object {
|
|
private const val privateConst: Int = 1
|
|
protected const val protectedConst: Int = 2
|
|
public const val publicConst: Int = 3
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun check(clazz: Class<*>, expectProtected: Boolean = true) {
|
|
val fields = clazz.declaredFields.filter { it.name.contains("Const") }
|
|
|
|
assert(fields.all { Modifier.isStatic(it.modifiers) }) { "`$clazz` contains non-static fields" }
|
|
|
|
assert(Modifier.isPrivate(fields.single { it.name.contains("private") }.modifiers)) {
|
|
"`$clazz`.privateConst is not private"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert(Modifier.isPublic(fields.single { it.name.contains("public") }.modifiers)) {
|
|
"`$clazz`.publicConst is not public"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (expectProtected) {
|
|
assert(Modifier.isProtected(fields.single { it.name.contains("protected") }.modifiers)) {
|
|
"`$clazz`.protectedConst is not protected"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
check(A::class.java, false)
|
|
check(B::class.java)
|
|
check(Class.forName("XYZ"), false)
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|