Dmitriy Novozhilov
89b98ef784
```kotlin
interface A {
fun foo() // (1)
}
interface B : A {
// f/o fun foo() // (2)
}
```
In previous commits it was forgotten to create new FIR declarations for
IR fake-overrides, which led to the situation when `IR lazy functions
of `(1)` and `(2)` both contained fir of function (1) as their base
declaration
It seems this change fixed some cases from KT-42020
30 lines
692 B
Kotlin
Vendored
30 lines
692 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
// IGNORE_CODEGEN_WITH_IR_FAKE_OVERRIDE_GENERATION
|
|
// Reason: KT-42020
|
|
|
|
open class Base<T> {
|
|
fun foo(x: T) = "x:$x"
|
|
fun foo(y: String) = "y:$y"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
open class Derived : Base<String>()
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
val b = Base<String>()
|
|
val test1 = b.foo(x = "O") + b.foo(y = "K")
|
|
if (test1 != "x:Oy:K")
|
|
throw Exception("test1: $test1")
|
|
|
|
val d = Derived()
|
|
val test2 = d.foo(x = "O") + d.foo(y = "K")
|
|
if (test2 != "x:Oy:K")
|
|
throw Exception("test2: $test2")
|
|
|
|
val bd: Base<String> = Derived()
|
|
val test4 = bd.foo(x = "O") + bd.foo(y = "K")
|
|
if (test4 != "x:Oy:K")
|
|
throw Exception("test4: $test4")
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|