6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
42 lines
1.1 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
42 lines
1.1 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Base
|
|
// Public signature: /Base|null[0]
|
|
interface Base<in E : Any?> {
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Derived
|
|
// Public signature: /Derived|null[0]
|
|
interface Derived<in E : Any?> : Base<E> {
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: Receiver
|
|
// Public signature: /Receiver|null[0]
|
|
interface Receiver<out E : Any?> {
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: #box(){}kotlin.String
|
|
// Public signature: /box|-9347091776561469[0]
|
|
fun box(): String
|
|
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: #foo(Receiver<0:0>){0§<kotlin.Any?>}0:0
|
|
// Public signature: /foo|1374936692204158291[0]
|
|
fun <R : Any?> foo(r: Receiver<R>): R
|
|
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: #produce(kotlin.Function1<Derived<0:0>,kotlin.Unit>){0§<kotlin.Any?>}0:0
|
|
// Public signature: /produce|-8861632226015581377[0]
|
|
fun <E : Any?> produce(block: @ExtensionFunctionType Function1<Derived<E>, Unit>): E
|
|
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: #toChannel@Receiver<0:0>(0:1){0§<kotlin.Any?>;1§<Base<0:0>>}0:1
|
|
// Public signature: /toChannel|5706628675310331058[0]
|
|
fun <E : Any?, C : Base<E>> Receiver<E>.toChannel(destination: C): C
|
|
|