Denis.Zharkov
a750d9466e
The difference is how we deal with intermediate fake overrides
E.g., in case
interface A { /* $1 */ fun foo() }
interface B : A {
/* $2 */ fake_override fun foo()
}
interface C : B {
/* $3 */ override fun foo()
}
We've got FIR declarations only for $1 and $3, but we've got
a fake override for $2 in IR.
Previously, override $3 had $1 as its overridden IR symbol, just because
FIR declaration of $3 doesn't know anything about $2.
Now, when generating IR for $2, we save the necessary information
and using it for $3, so it has $2 as overridden.
So, it's consistent with the overridden structure of FE 1.0 and this
structure is necessary prerequisite for proper building of bridges
for special built-ins.
27 lines
464 B
Kotlin
Vendored
27 lines
464 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// DONT_TARGET_EXACT_BACKEND: WASM
|
|
// WASM_MUTE_REASON: STDLIB_COLLECTIONS
|
|
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
|
|
import java.util.AbstractMap
|
|
import java.util.Collections
|
|
|
|
class A : AbstractMap<Int, String>() {
|
|
override val entries: MutableSet<MutableMap.MutableEntry<Int, String>> get() = Collections.emptySet()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
val a = A()
|
|
val b = A()
|
|
|
|
a.remove(0)
|
|
|
|
a.putAll(b)
|
|
a.clear()
|
|
|
|
a.keys
|
|
a.values
|
|
a.entries
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|