For CallKind.VariableAccess, the condition when to *skip* resolution of
objects was previously collector.isSuccess. This wasn't strict enough
because collector.isSuccess could be true when the best found candidate
has an applicability like RESOLVED_WITH_LOW_PRIORITY (e.g. from dynamic
scope or annotated with @LowPriorityInOverloadResolution). In these
cases, we do want to resolve objects. To fix this, the condition is
changed to collector.shouldStopResolve which is stricter.
#KT-57960 Fixed
Kirill Rakhman
8b47a4fa48