6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
37 lines
1.0 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
37 lines
1.0 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
// FULL_JDK
|
|
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
|
|
// MUTE_SIGNATURE_COMPARISON_K2: ANY
|
|
// ^ KT-57429
|
|
|
|
import java.lang.reflect.Type
|
|
|
|
interface ComponentContainer
|
|
|
|
interface PlatformSpecificExtension<S : PlatformSpecificExtension<S>>
|
|
|
|
interface ComponentDescriptor
|
|
|
|
abstract class PlatformExtensionsClashResolver<E : PlatformSpecificExtension<E>>(
|
|
val applicableTo: Class<E>
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
class ClashResolutionDescriptor<E : PlatformSpecificExtension<E>>(
|
|
container: ComponentContainer,
|
|
private val resolver: PlatformExtensionsClashResolver<E>,
|
|
private val clashedComponents: List<ComponentDescriptor>
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
private val registrationMap = hashMapOf<Type, Any>()
|
|
|
|
fun resolveClashesIfAny(container: ComponentContainer, clashResolvers: List<PlatformExtensionsClashResolver<*>>) {
|
|
for (resolver in clashResolvers) {
|
|
val clashedComponents = registrationMap[resolver.applicableTo] as? Collection<ComponentDescriptor> ?: continue
|
|
|
|
val substituteDescriptor = ClashResolutionDescriptor(container, resolver, clashedComponents.toList())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|