Sergej Jaskiewicz
6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
26 lines
726 B
Kotlin
Vendored
26 lines
726 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: KotlinBox
|
|
// Public signature: /KotlinBox|null[0]
|
|
class KotlinBox<T : Any?> {
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: KotlinBox{}data
|
|
// Public signature: /KotlinBox.data|4273011692695536650[0]
|
|
val data: T?
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: KotlinBox#<get-data>(){}1:0?
|
|
// Public signature: /KotlinBox.data.<get-data>|-1848755759162008356[0]
|
|
get
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:
|
|
// Mangled name: KotlinBox#<init>(1:0?){}
|
|
// Public signature: /KotlinBox.<init>|-6137285739236751325[0]
|
|
constructor(data: T?) /* primary */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK JVM_IR:
|
|
// Mangled name: #f(KotlinBox<JavaBox>){}kotlin.String
|
|
// Public signature: /f|-1490534641019781585[0]
|
|
fun f(r: KotlinBox<JavaBox>): String
|
|
|