Sergej Jaskiewicz
6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
53 lines
1.0 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
53 lines
1.0 KiB
Kotlin
Vendored
// TARGET_BACKEND: JVM
|
|
// DUMP_LOCAL_DECLARATION_SIGNATURES
|
|
|
|
// MUTE_SIGNATURE_COMPARISON_K2: ANY
|
|
// ^ KT-57430, KT-57788
|
|
|
|
// FILE: kt43217.kt
|
|
class A {
|
|
private val b =
|
|
object : DoubleExpression() {
|
|
override fun get(): Double {
|
|
return 0.0
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class C : DoubleExpression() {
|
|
override fun get() = 0.0
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: DoubleExpression.java
|
|
import org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull;
|
|
|
|
public abstract class DoubleExpression implements ObservableDouble {
|
|
@NotNull
|
|
@Override
|
|
public Object isEqualTo(double value) {
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: ObservableValue.java
|
|
import org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull;
|
|
|
|
public interface ObservableValue<T> {
|
|
@NotNull
|
|
T get();
|
|
|
|
@NotNull
|
|
default Object isEqualTo(@NotNull T value) {
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FILE: ObservableDouble.java
|
|
import org.jetbrains.annotations.NotNull;
|
|
|
|
public interface ObservableDouble extends ObservableValue<Double> {
|
|
@NotNull
|
|
Object isEqualTo(double value);
|
|
}
|
|
|