Sergej Jaskiewicz
6e8283a6fe
The reason #1 for this feature is that we want to test IdSignatures generated for declarations. Currently, there is no (easy) way to ensure that a change in the signature building logic doesn't cause any breaking changes wrt klibs. Now, most IdSignatures include hashed mangled names in them, so even if we catch a regression where the included hash changes, there would be no way of knowing immediately what caused it, unless we'd also have mangled names in the expectations. The reason #2 is to test the manglers themselves. Currently, there are no tests for them. They heavily duplicate each other, this is already causing issues (see KT-57427) that would be very hard to catch without these tests. ^KT-58238 Fixed
22 lines
488 B
Kotlin
Vendored
22 lines
488 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// DUMP_LOCAL_DECLARATION_SIGNATURES
|
|
// IGNORE_BACKEND: JS_IR
|
|
// IGNORE_BACKEND: JS_IR_ES6
|
|
// KT-50774
|
|
|
|
// MUTE_SIGNATURE_COMPARISON_K2: ANY
|
|
// ^ KT-57427, KT-57754
|
|
|
|
class Wrapper(var baseUrl: String)
|
|
|
|
enum class ConfigurationParameter {
|
|
BASE_URL(
|
|
{ value, nc ->
|
|
println("Base url updated from config parameters " + nc.baseUrl + " -> " + value)
|
|
nc.baseUrl = value
|
|
}
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
constructor(apply: (String, Wrapper) -> Unit) {}
|
|
}
|