a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
15 lines
425 B
Kotlin
Vendored
15 lines
425 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
enum class Color { RED, GREEN, BLUE }
|
|
|
|
fun foo(arr: Array<Color>): Color {
|
|
loop@ for (color in arr) {
|
|
when (color) {
|
|
Color.RED -> return color
|
|
Color.GREEN -> break@loop
|
|
Color.BLUE -> if (arr.size == 1) return color else continue@loop
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return Color.GREEN
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box() = if (foo(arrayOf(Color.BLUE, Color.GREEN)) == Color.GREEN) "OK" else "FAIL" |