Nikolay Lunyak
a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
30 lines
492 B
Kotlin
Vendored
30 lines
492 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// KT-44054
|
|
|
|
enum class Enum {
|
|
Entry1,
|
|
Entry2
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class Outer {
|
|
fun fooCaller(): Enum = obj.foo()
|
|
|
|
private abstract inner class Inner<T>(val default: T) {
|
|
fun foo(): T {
|
|
return default
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private val obj = object : Inner<Enum>(Enum.Entry1) {
|
|
fun bar(): Enum {
|
|
return default
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
val o = Outer()
|
|
if (o.fooCaller() != Enum.Entry1) return "Fail"
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|