Nikolay Lunyak
a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
42 lines
699 B
Kotlin
Vendored
42 lines
699 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// SKIP_MANGLE_VERIFICATION
|
|
|
|
// MODULE: lib
|
|
// FILE: l.kt
|
|
|
|
interface I {
|
|
fun foo(): String
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
enum class E(val i: I, val l: () -> String) {
|
|
A(object : I {
|
|
override fun foo(): String = "AI"
|
|
}, { "AL" }) ,
|
|
B(object : I {
|
|
override fun foo(): String = "BI"
|
|
}, { "BL" }),
|
|
C(object : I {
|
|
override fun foo(): String = "CI"
|
|
}, { "CL" })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// MODULE: main(lib)
|
|
// FILE: m.kt
|
|
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
var result = ""
|
|
|
|
result += E.A.i.foo()
|
|
result += E.A.l()
|
|
|
|
result += E.B.i.foo()
|
|
result += E.B.l()
|
|
|
|
result += E.C.i.foo()
|
|
result += E.C.l()
|
|
|
|
if (result != "AIALBIBLCICL") return "FAIL: $result"
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
} |