Nikolay Lunyak
a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
29 lines
622 B
Kotlin
Vendored
29 lines
622 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
interface IFoo {
|
|
fun foo(e: En): String
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
enum class En {
|
|
TEST {
|
|
inner class Nested : IFoo {
|
|
private val ee = TEST
|
|
|
|
override fun foo(e: En): String {
|
|
return if (e == ee) e.ok else "Failed"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
override val ok: String get() = "OK"
|
|
override fun foo(): IFoo = Nested()
|
|
},
|
|
OTHER {
|
|
override val ok: String get() = throw AssertionError()
|
|
override fun foo(): IFoo = throw AssertionError()
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
abstract val ok: String
|
|
abstract fun foo(): IFoo
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box() = En.TEST.foo().foo(En.TEST)
|