Nikolay Lunyak
a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
22 lines
489 B
Kotlin
Vendored
22 lines
489 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// KT-4423 Enum with function not compiled
|
|
// SKIP_MANGLE_VERIFICATION
|
|
|
|
enum class Sign(val str: String, val func: (x: Int, y: Int) -> Int){
|
|
plus("+", { x, y -> x + y }),
|
|
|
|
mult("*", { x, y -> x * y }) {
|
|
override fun toString() = "${func(4,5)}"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
val sum = Sign.plus.func(2, 3)
|
|
if (sum != 5) return "Fail 1: $sum"
|
|
|
|
val product = Sign.mult.toString()
|
|
if (product != "20") return "Fail 2: $product"
|
|
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|