a9343aeb7d
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB` in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate `entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`, but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it, and proceeds. The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired `classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`. The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1 is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR (by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the `get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed"). The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its own `IrClassSymbol`. ^KT-55840 Fixed Merge-request: KT-MR-8727 Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
16 lines
366 B
Kotlin
Vendored
16 lines
366 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
enum class Foo(val a: Int = 1, val b: String = "a") {
|
|
A(),
|
|
B(2, "b"),
|
|
C(b = "b"),
|
|
D(a = 2)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fun box(): String {
|
|
if (Foo.A.a != 1 || Foo.A.b != "a") return "fail"
|
|
if (Foo.B.a != 2 || Foo.B.b != "b") return "fail"
|
|
if (Foo.C.a != 1 || Foo.C.b != "b") return "fail"
|
|
if (Foo.D.a != 2 || Foo.D.b != "a") return "fail"
|
|
return "OK"
|
|
}
|