Using `kotlin.jvm.functions.Function{n+1}` (via
`getJvmSuspendFunctionClass`) for suspend functions was wrong in the
function reference lowering, because we didn't adapt the parameter types
by transforming the last type to Continuation and adding Object, and
generic signature ended up being incorrect.
Actually there was no need to use `kotlin.jvm.functions.Function{n+1}`
at all. We can just use the built-in
`kotlin.coroutines.SuspendFunction{n}` as a supertype, and it will be
mapped correctly later in codegen. It's not even needed to add the
`kotlin.coroutines.jvm.internal.SuspendFunction` marker manually, since
it's also handled by the codegen (see `IrTypeMapper.mapClassSignature`).
#KT-48732 Fixed
Alexander Udalov
31ba7f24b1