Nikolay Lunyak
603b46e531
Passing `EXTENSION_RECEIVER` when processing `noReceiver` looks like a mistake in general. This change is backed by the `hidesMembers` and `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` tests. The exact reason with `memberWithHidesMemberAnnotationVsMemberWithout` is that it first checks `@HidesMembers` candidates, only takes the `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach`, but then yields `InapplicableWrongReceiver`, because `explicitReceiverKind = EXTENSION_RECEIVER` (which is strange, because we really don't have an explicit receiver). Then we visit the same scope once more (now for all candidates) and take 2 functions: - `kotlin/collections/Iterable<T>.forEach` - `kotlin/sequence/Sequence<T>.forEach` ...and they both result in `RESOLVED`, because this time `explicitReceiverKind = NO_EXPLICIT_RECEIVER`. This change ensures the first candidate we see while checking `@HidesMembers` is taken as `RESOLVED`. ^KT-55503 Fixed
33 lines
463 B
Kotlin
Vendored
33 lines
463 B
Kotlin
Vendored
// FIR_IDENTICAL
|
|
// WITH_STDLIB
|
|
// FIR_DUMP
|
|
|
|
// FILE: First.kt
|
|
|
|
package sample.pack
|
|
|
|
@Suppress("INVISIBLE_REFERENCE", "INVISIBLE_MEMBER")
|
|
@kotlin.internal.HidesMembers
|
|
fun A.forEach() = "::A.forEach"
|
|
|
|
class A {
|
|
fun B.forEach() = "A::B.forEach"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class B
|
|
|
|
// FILE: Second.kt
|
|
|
|
package sample
|
|
|
|
import sample.pack.*
|
|
|
|
fun box() {
|
|
return with(A()) {
|
|
with(B()) {
|
|
// Both K1 & K2 resolve to A::B.check
|
|
forEach()
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|