Basically, the test checks that adding Enum.entries feature doesn't
break the existing code where it clashes with the user-defined "entries"
declaration; it's better to have a black-box test to be sure
that the compiler doesn't invoke something different at runtime
The test covers KT-53153 and KT-56587
Merge-request: KT-MR-9798
Merged-by: Michail Zarečenskij <Mikhail.Zarechenskiy@jetbrains.com>
This change allows to revert adding `WITH_STDLIB` directive
to tests which happened at `a9343aeb`.
Co-authored-by: Alexander Udalov <Alexander.Udalov@jetbrains.com>
This inconsistency is present due to not using the `// WITH_STDLIB`
in the above tests. When K1 creates the enum, it tries to generate
`entries()`, and for that it tries to load `kotlin.enums.EnumEntries`,
but this is actually an unresolved reference. K1 silently swallows it,
and proceeds.
The reason K2 doesn't fail is that in order to generate `entries()` it
simply creates the necessary `ConeClassLikeType` with the desired
`classId` instead of loading the whole `ClassDescriptor`.
The reason we can still observe `$ENTRIES` and `$entries` in K1
is because they are generated during the JVM codegen, and it
only checks if the `EnumEntries` language feature is supported. It
doesn't check if the `entries` property has really existed in IR
(by this time it's expected to have already been lowered to the
`get-entries` function - that's why "has ... existed").
The reason why the codegen doesn't fail when working with
`kotlin.enums.EnumEntries` is because it creates its
own `IrClassSymbol`.
^KT-55840 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-8727
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Leveraging the same mechanism with $EntriesMapping as Java enums.
Old (compiled with LV/AV < 1.8) enums are detected by looking for
static special <get-entries> method that cannot be introduced on
Kotlin enums otherwise
#KT-53236
We are going to deprecate `WITH_RUNTIME` directive. The main reason
behind this change is that `WITH_STDLIB` directive better describes
its meaning, specifically it will add kotlin stdlib to test's classpath.
In tests merged from boxAgainstJava in 29b96aa1, some directories were
named slightly differently compared to box, e.g. "property" vs
"properties", "varargs" vs "vararg". This change renames these, moves
some of the tests to more fitting directories, and also renames
"visibility" to "javaVisibility" because it's about Java visibilities
specifically.
Artem Kobzar