This test introduces very special (for current implementation) case,
when we have smartcast indirectly, via some reified type parameter.
It covers recursive call inSmartCastManager.checkAndRecordPossibleCast(),
which wasn't previously covered by any test in testbase.
Expect members should always lose in resolution to non-expect members,
be it simple calls or callable references. Note that there should be
exactly one actual member for each expect member in correct code, so
both ways to check for expect vs non-expect are correct: either before
signature comparison, or after.
#KT-20903 Fixed
The problem is that when performing full analysis we do it in
a backward order while result for trivial vals is filled
in a forward one.
It turns out that reversedInstuctions might return a superset of
forward traversed instructions, e.g. in case of dead code in lambda.
At the same time result for trivial vals is constant
for any instruction, thus we can just return its constant value
and use it in the full analysis
#KT-20895 Fixed
From Kotlin's point of view, everything in annotation classes is
non-abstract. A class inheriting from an annotation has a non-abstract
fake override for each property of the annotation class constructor. But
because members of annotation classes themselves were considered as
abstract in the bridge-generating code (see
DescriptorBasedFunctionHandle.isAbstract), there was a situation where a
concrete fake override has only one declaration among overridden
descriptors and it was abstract. This situation is invalid (a concrete
fake override must have exactly one concrete super-declaration),
therefore an exception was thrown.
The fix is to avoid considering annotation class members abstract for
the purposes of bridge generation. It's reasonably safe because no
bridges should be ever generated for annotation subclasses anyway,
because annotations can only have members with simple return types
(final and non-generic).
Note that in KT-19928, the problem is reproducible because of an
incorrect "inexact analysis" in light classes where "Target" is resolved
to an annotation class kotlin.annotation.Target. This behavior of the
analysis in light classes seems to do no harm otherwise, so it's not a
goal of this commit to change anything in that regard
#KT-19928 Fixed
When recursion is detected while computing
`ClassResolutionScopesSupport.scopeForMemberDeclarationResolution`,
create 'ThrowingLexicalScope' (as with other scopes), instead of
throwing ISE immediately. That allows to report error properly in cases
like in KT-18514
#KT-18514 Fixed
Note that current behaviour is made similar to the case with
properties initializers/accessors, which means that more complex
cases are not covered yet (see KT-20801) #KT-20802 fixed.
The reason is that before dc02b2e3ab and 8a0dcca957,
TypeConstructor.isFinal for some class descriptors
(DeserializedClassDescriptor, LazyJavaClassDescriptor,
MutableClassDescriptor) were implemented as `isFinalClass` (which is
`modality == FINAL && kind != ENUM_CLASS`), and all others as
`modality == FINAL` or simply true/false. This led to differences in
behavior depending on the exact instance of the class descriptor.
Now that TypeConstructor.isFinal is always `modality == FINAL`, some
tests (PseudoValueTestGenerated) fail because the finality of some type
constructors changed and these tests render final vs non-final type
constructors differently.
In this commit, TypeConstructor.isFinal is now made to behave safer,
i.e. considering enum class type constructor to be non-final (as was the
case earlier for some ClassDescriptor instances). Some diagnostics might
disappear (e.g. FINAL_UPPER_BOUND) but it doesn't look like a big deal
Divide incompatibility on two groups: strong and weak. Strong incompatibility means that if declaration with such incompatibility has no `actual` modifier then it's considered as usual overload and we'll not report any error on it.
#KT-20540 Fixed
#KT-20680 Fixed
- Make AbstractDiagnosticsTest dump function contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on parsing contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on smartcats in presence of functions with
contracts
- Add diagnostics tests on initialization and flow in presence of
in-place called lambdas
==========
Introduction of EffectSystem: 16/18
This commit support the following case.
Suppose we have such declaration:
fun <T> foo(): T { ... }
Then in code we want to use it like this: `foo() as String`.
But in LV <= 1.1 we have type inference error: "Not enough
information for type parameter `T`". This error happened because we
do not use type from cast as expected type for call.
In this commit we fix this problem and use this type as expected type
in following cases:
- our function has only one type parameter (this can be relaxed later)
- function parameter types and extension receiver type not contains `T`
Also this fix problem with `findViewById`.
Already signature was: `fun findViewById(...): View`
and was used like: `findViewById() as MyView`.
New signature is `fun <T : View> findViewById(...): T`
and old usage was broken because of problem described above
Mikhail Zarechenskiy