K1 allows writing access to a public setter of a protected synthetic
property only if the call is inside a subclass. K2 previously allowed
that unconditionally. This changes brings the behavior in line with K1.
^KT-56050 Fixed
`INVISIBLE_REFERENCE` may be reported due to CandidateApplicability via
a ConeDiagnostic, or in a checker. The former leads to
`FirErrorResolvedQualifier`, so the checker is not called.
This makes little sense, because CandidateApplicability may result in
`NO_COMPANION_OBJECT`, which would prevent other more meaningful
diagnostics from being reported (like `API_NOT_AVAILABLE`).
If we run checkers for `FirErrorResolvedQualifier` we may get duplicate
`INVISIBLE_REFERENCE`. The change in the checker prevents it.
After this commit we:
- preserve Enum.entries synthetic property in tower even in case the bound feature is OFF
- report an error on Enum.entries call in specific checker if the feature is OFF
- give this synthetic property lower priority, no matter feature ON or OFF
#KT-55251 Fixed
This reverts commit b09561c3c3.
It was decided to postpone this warning till 1.9
This is needed to provide proper IDE support
^KT-40904 Open
^KT-55177 Open
`TYPE_MISMATCH` in `throwJLException.fir.kt` appeared,
because in `throw Exn` the type of `Exn` is implicit Unit.
This is red code anyway.
^KT-55181 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-8292
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
- `.ll.kt` test data can be added in cases where LL FIR resolution
legally diverges from K2 compiler results.
- Each `.ll.kt` test is prefixed with an `LL_FIR_DIVERGENCE` directive
which must explain why the test may diverge from K2 compiler results.
- `LLFirDivergenceCommentChecker` ensures that each `.ll.kt` file
contains an `LL_FIR_DIVERGENCE` directive.
- `LLFirIdenticalChecker` results in an assertion error if the `.ll.kt`
test and its base test are completely identical, including in their
meta info (but ignoring `LL_FIR_DIVERGENCE`).
- The checker additionally ensures that the base source file and the
`.ll.kt` source file have identical Kotlin source code (ignoring
meta info and `LL_FIR_DIVERGENCE`). This ensures that both tests
test the exact same thing.
- `.ll.kt` files are ignored by select test generators, in addition to
`.fir.kt` files.
- Move out getAnalyzerServices from FirFrontendFacade to TestSetupUtils
- Simplify DependencyListForCliModule. Now it takes BinaryModuleData as input
- FirOutArtifact contains several FirOutputArtifactPart
- Simplify FirFrontendFacade
Instead, rely on the variable assignment analyzer to properly restrict
smart casts. This makes error messages more consistent, but otherwise
should have no effect.
Apparently if you add an empty line at the start of the FIR file, that's
not enough of a difference for the test suite to complain about, but
enough for it to not add the FIR_IDENTICAL directive...
While it is theoretically useful to know that `{ while(true) {} }`
returns Nothing, CFG node deadness is not precise enough to do that: if
the entire lambda is dead, it's no longer possible to find out whether
the loop is terminating. Besides, `while (true)` and `if (true)` are
pretty much the only constructs like that anyway.
Note that this commit does not affect resolution for lambdas that end in
a Nothing-returning expression, e.g. `throw`.
* `return` should only be added to the last statement if the return
type is not Unit
* If there is a `return` without an argument, then the expected return
type is Unit and the last expression is not a return argument (unless
it's an incomplete call, in which case it is inferred to return Unit;
this behavior is questionable, but inherited from K1)
* There should be a constraint on return arguments even if the expected
type is Unit, otherwise errors will be missed
* When the expected type is known, using the call completion results
writer is pointless (and probably subtly wrong).
^KT-54742 Fixed
This should solve the problem with deadlocks/performance in the K2 IDE
This is a temporary solution until the ^KT-55387 is properly fixed
^KT-55387
^KT-54890
Note that there is a questionable behavior that will be fixed later.
Right now it's not fully clear because for the same situation in Kotlin, the compiler reports warnings at declaration-site and it's not possible to do so for Java
^KT-53153
Kirill Rakhman