Overriding equals, hashCode, toString and any other member that is not
expect does not require satisfying the rules of expect-actual matching.
#KT-57381 Fixed
- An `OptionalAnnotationClassesProvider` only needs to be created if the
package part provider may even have optional annotation classes.
- In the IDE case, the package part provider never provides optional
annotation classes, so especially in the IDE, we can avoid a lot of
useless symbol providers with this.
This fixes an issue where an actual class from an intermediate module
has more supertypes than its expect declaration which leads to a
false-positive resolution error because a type reference resolves to the
expect class. The fix is to sort the dependencies topologically from
"most actual" to "most expect" when creating the list of symbol
providers.
#KT-57369 Fixed
The problem was that we were using unenhanced constructors that still
might contain java type refs.
Basically, most of the `firClass.declarations` usages are unsafe in that
meaning.
The test is very complicated because to reproduce the exception there
should be some conditions met:
- MyClass should be compiled with K1, so it has `@EnhancedNullability`
annotation serialized (that is unnecessary, but don't do any harm)
- `@Nls` scope should be properly resolved, so enum entries are converted
to resolved type refs
- That leads to attempt to check if null-check might be needed to be
inserted and to failure at FirTypeUtilsKt.getCanBeNull
While this quite controversial to have this check being performed for
freshly created annotations calls, the problem with improper constructor
lookup anyway existed and fixed correctly.
^KT-57213 Fixed
In a lot of cases, when we want to process the
declaration in scope, it should be resolved to at least TYPES phase.
To avoid doing it manually in all our variety of scopes, we do it when the scope it created.
It was implicitly working manually before as lazy resolve did a lot of extra work
on resolving a declaration it was not supposed to resolve.
Now it's not the case, and we have to explicitly resolve all the declarations we need.
^KT-56543
Co-authored-by: Ilya Kirillov <ilya.kirillov@jetbrains.com>
- If the callee reference in a desugared compound assignment was an
error reference, the compound assignment wasn't cached by
`FirElementsRecorder`. This led to KTIJ-24895 (see the issue for more
details).
- The solution falls back on the compound assignment's source to decide
`isSourceForCompoundAccess`, as an operation name can be reconstructed
from the PSI.
^KTIJ-24895 fixed
Otherwise, when we come to `ClassCodegen.kt:173
for `GradleActionTest` and check
`FUN FAKE_OVERRIDE name:<get-project>`,
we then go to `JvmSignatureClashDetector.kt:37`,
and call `mapRawSignature(overriddenFunction)`
which ignores the original `@JvmName`.
It does so because it relies on the property copy
which forgets to copy the getter, but
`@get:JvmName` is stored in it.
Extra when-branches for `FAKE_OVERRIDE` are needed,
because otherwise the annotations would not
be copied in `Fir2IrDeclarationStorage.kt:723`.
Extra when-branches for `DELEGATED_MEMBER` are
needed, because otherwise the generated IR changes
in some tests. For example, see:
`FirLightTreeIrTextTestGenerated.Declarations.testKt35550`.
The `assumesBackingField`-related change is backed by
the `FirLightTreeIrTextTestGenerated.Stubs.testJavaEnum` test.
`this.body = null` ensures the resulting IR
matches K1.
The change in `FirImplicitBodyResolve.kt` is needed,
because otherwise the bootstrap compiler fails at
`:compiler:frontend:compileKotlin`,
but I didn't come up with a smaller test for it.
If we don't make an explicit accessor copy,
then when we later create a `Fir2IrLazyPropertyAccessor`
for the fake override getter, it's `fir` will
be a reference to the `FirProperty`, not `FirPropertyAccessor`.
That's why `DumpIrTreeVisitor` will render `IntrinsicConstEvaluation` as
a getter annotation as well.
`FirPsiIrTextTestGenerated.testDelegatedGenericImplementation`
renders type parameters from `<get-x>`,
because when assigning `extensionReceiverParameter`
of the setter `<set-x>` we come to
`Fir2IrClassifierStorage.kt:638`,
and in this cache there's the parameter with
the `<get-x>` parent.
Note that `typeContext.origin == DEFAULT` in
`getCachedIrTypeParameter`.
It's `DEFAULT` because at the line `Fir2IrDeclarationStorage.kt:335`
the `function` variable is `null` (because there's no setter).
The change in `declarationAttributes.kt` is backed
by the `FirPsiIrTextTestGenerated.testKt45853` test.
^KT-57104 Fixed
^KT-57432 Fixed
Merge-request: KT-MR-9210
Merged-by: Nikolay Lunyak <Nikolay.Lunyak@jetbrains.com>
Nikolay Lunyak