- First parameter should have type of K instead of Any
- Special bridge should return second parameter if a key has wrong type
- Special bridge may throw an exception if defaultValue has wrong type
#KT-13209 Fixed
In an expression such as "Obj::class" where Obj is an object, it's fine to
consider Obj either an expression or a type and generate either
Obj.INSTANCE.getClass() or Obj.class correspondingly. However,
the former fails in the object's super constructor call because the INSTANCE
field is not yet initialized. Thus, we force generation of Obj.class in case
when Obj is an object.
Note that this has been reproduced in our project, see
KotlinMetadataVersionIndex
- Inline the usage of ExpressionCodegen#generateClassLiteralReference into
ClosureCodegen, simplify
- Support DoubleColonLHS.Expression in generateClassLiteralReference
- Substantially simplify KClass.java intrinsic by reusing
generateClassLiteralReference
#KT-13075 Fixed
#KT-12995 In Progress
As well as for other kinds of expressions
Within attached test they were generated twice in case of last expression of coroutine block,
because coroutine related codegen part is built upon assumption that all expressions should be generated lazily
Also add a test about unary postfix increment/decrement
#KT-13156 Fixed
Do not treat var as alive just because current instruction belongs to an item range
in local variables table, but the item has different sort of type
As liveness analysis is mostly used in coroutines spilling,
not applying this change may lead that to problems on Android (see tests)
At first we try to resolve 'handleResult' just as last expression
in a lambda is first argument, then if results are unsuccessful
try resolve 'handleResult' with fake Unit expression
#KT-12969 Fixed
It works only for Java methods and it's purpose is Java overridability rules emulation,
namely distinction of primitive types and their wrappers.
For example `void foo(Integer x)` should not be an override for `void foo(int x)`
#KT-11440 Fixed
#KT-11389 Fixed
Do not generate stubs if there is no special bridge in the current class
- there are already Kotlin super class in hierarchy
- special bridge has the same signature as method itself
#KT-11915 Fixed
The problem is that
`override fun remove(element: E): CollectionWithRemove<E>`
seems to be illegal from Java's point of view, while it's OK for JVM
These declarations have the same signature (return type is isgnored)
- override fun remove(element: E): CollectionWithRemove<E>
- override fun remove(element: E): Boolean
When we meet such declaration we choose random declaration for fake override in synthetic class
that may lead to signature clash
Dmitry Petrov