Note that the current FE1.0 implementation still has some limitations
1. only references used as receiver are being considered for smartcast.
2. Somehow the smartcast information is not retained if the for generic
typed receivers. See multiSmartcastAsReceiver_stable.descriptors.txt
The following error code path only runs in depended mode.
Test succeeded in normal analysis mode but failed in depended analysis mode.
java.lang.Exception: Test succeeded in normal analysis mode but failed in depended analysis mode.
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.runTest(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:126)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.OverriddenDeclarationProviderTestGenerated.testOnEnumEntry(OverriddenDeclarationProviderTestGenerated.java:72)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.platform.commons.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:688)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.MethodInvocation.proceed(MethodInvocation.java:60)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain$ValidatingInvocation.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:131)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.intercept(TimeoutExtension.java:149)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.interceptTestableMethod(TimeoutExtension.java:140)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.extension.TimeoutExtension.interceptTestMethod(TimeoutExtension.java:84)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker$ReflectiveInterceptorCall.lambda$ofVoidMethod$0(ExecutableInvoker.java:115)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.lambda$invoke$0(ExecutableInvoker.java:105)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain$InterceptedInvocation.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:106)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.proceed(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:64)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.chainAndInvoke(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:45)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.InvocationInterceptorChain.invoke(InvocationInterceptorChain.java:37)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.invoke(ExecutableInvoker.java:104)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.execution.ExecutableInvoker.invoke(ExecutableInvoker.java:98)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.lambda$invokeTestMethod$6(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:210)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.invokeTestMethod(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:206)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.execute(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:131)
at org.junit.jupiter.engine.descriptor.TestMethodTestDescriptor.execute(TestMethodTestDescriptor.java:65)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$5(NodeTestTask.java:139)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$7(NodeTestTask.java:129)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.Node.around(Node.java:137)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.lambda$executeRecursively$8(NodeTestTask.java:127)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ThrowableCollector.execute(ThrowableCollector.java:73)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.executeRecursively(NodeTestTask.java:126)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.NodeTestTask.execute(NodeTestTask.java:84)
at org.junit.platform.engine.support.hierarchical.ForkJoinPoolHierarchicalTestExecutorService$ExclusiveTask.compute(ForkJoinPoolHierarchicalTestExecutorService.java:185)
at java.util.concurrent.RecursiveAction.exec(RecursiveAction.java:189)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:289)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1056)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1692)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:175)
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No designation of local declaration public final static enum entry MyEntry: R|MyEnum|
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.doTestByFileStructure(AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.kt:79)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.test.framework.AbstractHLApiSingleModuleTest.doTestByFileStructure(AbstractHLApiSingleModuleTest.kt:16)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.runTest(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:117)
... 38 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No designation of local declaration public final static enum entry MyEntry: R|MyEnum|
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.FirDeclarationDesignationKt.collectDesignation(FirDeclarationDesignation.kt:90)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.runBodyResolveOnAir(LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.kt:239)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.api.LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.getResolveStateForDependentCopy(LowLevelFirApiFacadeForResolveOnAir.kt:175)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.KtFirAnalysisSession.createContextDependentCopy(KtFirAnalysisSession.kt:102)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.low.level.api.fir.test.base.AbstractLowLevelApiTest.analyse(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:203)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.access$analyse(AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest.kt:22)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest$doTestByFileStructure$$inlined$executeOnPooledThreadInReadAction$1$1.compute(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:183)
at com.intellij.mock.MockApplication.runReadAction(MockApplication.java:183)
at org.jetbrains.kotlin.analysis.api.fir.components.AbstractOverriddenDeclarationProviderTest$doTestByFileStructure$$inlined$executeOnPooledThreadInReadAction$1.call(AbstractLowLevelApiTest.kt:183)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:652)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1$1.run(Executors.java:649)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$PrivilegedThreadFactory$1.run(Executors.java:649)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
1. Inner class constructor should have its outer class as a dispatch
receiver, since it is necessary for the call. Before it was null
2. Substituted inner class constructor should have its original dispatch
receiver type with the proper substitution. Before it was set to the
class itself (since the class was usually passed as a new dispatch
receiver)
Also, modify FIR renderer, so it properly renders the dispatch receiver
of the constructors
parameters.
This was causing exceptions with analysis API trying to resolve the
synthetic FirValueParameter because it could not find a KtDeclaration
for it. Using BODY_RESOLVE should be safe; the SAM constructor function
is also on BODY_RESOLVE and the type of the value parameter is known.
This way caller don't need to first check if the symbol is allowed to
override. The current API throws for cases like Java field, or enum
entry, which is not very user-friendly.
Tianyu Geng